Discussion:
Multiple IP's to one instance
(too old to reply)
Jonathan Bastin
2012-11-16 00:44:24 UTC
Permalink
I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to know is how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5 IP's to one instance.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Facundo Guerrero
2012-11-16 01:00:22 UTC
Permalink
Jonathan

Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I made
some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the same VM.






2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>

> I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to know is
> how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an isolated
> network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5 IP's to one
> instance.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other
> person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and
> delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions,
> views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of
> those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
>
Jonathan Bastin
2012-11-16 01:13:46 UTC
Permalink
That is a bit poo as if you want multiple SSL on the same server you need to
bind to an IP so somewhat limiting. This feature is a big thing. I did think
of a hack by adding more nics and other things but then cloudtack would just
override of you would get IP conflict.

Has the feature request been accepted and ETA set?

-----Original Message-----
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 16 November 2012 01:00
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

Jonathan

Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I made
some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the same VM.






2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>

> I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to
> know is how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using
> an isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> IP's to one instance.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------
> This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
> other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the
> sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent
> expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily
> representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated
companies.
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Kristoffer Sheather
2012-11-16 01:44:13 UTC
Permalink
This has been asked for over several years, so good luck!

On 16/11/2012, at 12:13 PM, Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> That is a bit poo as if you want multiple SSL on the same server you need to
> bind to an IP so somewhat limiting. This feature is a big thing. I did think
> of a hack by adding more nics and other things but then cloudtack would just
> override of you would get IP conflict.
>
> Has the feature request been accepted and ETA set?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 16 November 2012 01:00
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Jonathan
>
> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I made
> some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the same VM.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
>
>> I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
>> networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to
>> know is how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using
>> an isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
>> IP's to one instance.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------------------------------------------
>> This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
>> recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
>> information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
>> other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the
>> sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent
>> expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily
>> representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated
> companies.
>>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
>
Clayton Weise
2012-11-16 01:18:24 UTC
Permalink
How did you hack this on the virtual router? I'm not aware of any way to assign more than one IP address to a VM via DHCP.

-----Original Message-----
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

Jonathan

Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I made
some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the same VM.






2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>

> I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to know is
> how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an isolated
> network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5 IP's to one
> instance.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other
> person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and
> delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions,
> views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of
> those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
>
Clayton Weise
2012-11-16 01:19:30 UTC
Permalink
Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

Jonathan

Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I made
some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the same VM.






2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>

> I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to know is
> how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an isolated
> network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5 IP's to one
> instance.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other
> person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and
> delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions,
> views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of
> those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
>
Facundo Guerrero
2012-11-16 03:25:05 UTC
Permalink
I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made nat 1:1
to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm as eth0:1,
eth0:2.

Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24

I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.




2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>

> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Jonathan
>
> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I made
> some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the same VM.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to know
> is
> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an isolated
> > network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5 IP's to one
> > instance.
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other
> > person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and
> > delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions,
> > views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of
> > those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> >
>
Jonathan Bastin
2012-11-16 10:00:29 UTC
Permalink
Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this to
happen.

-----Original Message-----
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made nat 1:1
to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm as eth0:1,
eth0:2.

Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24

I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.




2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>

> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Jonathan
>
> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I
> made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the same
VM.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to
> > know
> is
> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an
> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> > IP's to one instance.
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------
> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the
> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent
> > expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily
> > representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated
companies.
> >
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Geoff Higginbottom
2012-11-16 10:50:42 UTC
Permalink
This gets my vote

Regards

Geoff


-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:***@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this to happen.

-----Original Message-----
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:***@ipaddress.com.ar]
Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made nat 1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm as eth0:1, eth0:2.

Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24

I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.




2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <***@iswest.net>

> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:***@ipaddress.com.ar]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Jonathan
>
> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I
> made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the
> same
VM.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <***@peerpointinternet.co.uk>
>
> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to
> > know
> is
> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an
> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> > IP's to one instance.
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------
> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the
> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent
> > expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily
> > representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated
companies.
> >
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and implementation services to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises to build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue’s expertise, combined with CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises to deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.

________________________________

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is
Facundo Guerrero
2012-11-16 14:21:19 UTC
Permalink
This is not the most elegant solution but it's works.

In the root home of the virtual router you have all cloudstack scripts.

This are the steps to change it :

mv /root/ipassoc.sh /root/ipassoc_orig.sh

Then i create my own ipassoc.sh and i add this :


#!/bin/bash

cd /root

/bin/bash /root/ipassoc_orig.sh $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9

/root/ipassoc_orig.sh -A -l PUBLICIP -c eth2 -g PublicGATEWAY
/root/firewall.sh -A -l PUBLICIP -r 10.1.1.2 -d 0:0 -G

/root/ipassoc_orig.sh -A -l XX.XX.XX.XX -c eth2 -g XX.XX.XX.XX
/root/firewall.sh -A -l XX.XX.XX.XX -r 10.1.1.3 -d 0:0 -G

Then

chmod +x ipassoc.sh



Then i use the firewall of cloudstack panel to open the Ports of this


I hope that you understand this



2012/11/16 Geoff Higginbottom <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org>

> This gets my vote
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this to
> happen.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made nat
> 1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm as
> eth0:1, eth0:2.
>
> Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
>
> I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I
> > made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the
> > same
> VM.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> > > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to
> > > know
> > is
> > > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an
> > > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> > > IP's to one instance.
> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> > > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> > > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
> > > other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the
> > > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent
> > > expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily
> > > representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated
> companies.
> > >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other
> person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and
> delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions,
> views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of
> those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
>
> ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and
> implementation services to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises to
> build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue’s expertise, combined with
> CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises to
> deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
>
> ________________________________
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of
> this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor
> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you
> have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
> in England & Wales.
>
Clayton Weise
2012-11-16 16:31:25 UTC
Permalink
That makes sense, however it only works with advanced networking and I believe the original post to this was to allow multiple IP addresses to be assigned in basic networking mode.

Another alternative with advanced networking in this scenario is to play some games with NAT (which is what we currently recommend to our customers). SSL bindings must be unique but not with IP, just with port & IP. Our workaround is to have clients bind SSL certs to unique ports internally and then map 443 on the public address to something like 1443, 1444, 1445, etc on the inside. I agree, it's a hack as well but it stays within the confines with what CloudStack permits and has control over.

Another way to handle this in an advanced zone would be to allow the NAT mapping to not only allow you to tie to a specific instance but perhaps to a free-form field where one can simply specify the internal address to map to. So that way even though the virtual router can't assign multiple IP addresses via DHCP, it gives the user the ability to specify a custom internal address to map to. And perhaps in the process, exclude that internal address from the DHCP pool so it doesn't get assigned to another instance creating a conflict.

-----Original Message-----
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 6:21 AM
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

This is not the most elegant solution but it's works.

In the root home of the virtual router you have all cloudstack scripts.

This are the steps to change it :

mv /root/ipassoc.sh /root/ipassoc_orig.sh

Then i create my own ipassoc.sh and i add this :


#!/bin/bash

cd /root

/bin/bash /root/ipassoc_orig.sh $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9

/root/ipassoc_orig.sh -A -l PUBLICIP -c eth2 -g PublicGATEWAY
/root/firewall.sh -A -l PUBLICIP -r 10.1.1.2 -d 0:0 -G

/root/ipassoc_orig.sh -A -l XX.XX.XX.XX -c eth2 -g XX.XX.XX.XX
/root/firewall.sh -A -l XX.XX.XX.XX -r 10.1.1.3 -d 0:0 -G

Then

chmod +x ipassoc.sh



Then i use the firewall of cloudstack panel to open the Ports of this


I hope that you understand this



2012/11/16 Geoff Higginbottom <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org>

> This gets my vote
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this to
> happen.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made nat
> 1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm as
> eth0:1, eth0:2.
>
> Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
>
> I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this. I
> > made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on the
> > same
> VM.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> > > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to
> > > know
> > is
> > > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an
> > > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> > > IP's to one instance.
> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> > > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> > > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
> > > other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the
> > > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent
> > > expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily
> > > representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated
> companies.
> > >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other
> person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and
> delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions,
> views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of
> those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
>
> ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and
> implementation services to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises to
> build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue's expertise, combined with
> CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises to
> deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
>
> ________________________________
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of
> this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor
> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you
> have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
> in England & Wales.
>
Jonathan Bastin
2012-11-16 16:35:51 UTC
Permalink
I have advanced network (I use vlans).

My idea of working would be to DHCP the first ip but allocate the next X
amount to the VPS to allow the user to manually add them to the OS
themselves. Thus limiting the changes to Cloudstack and also working within
the boundaries of DHCP.

-----Original Message-----
From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 16 November 2012 16:31
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

That makes sense, however it only works with advanced networking and I
believe the original post to this was to allow multiple IP addresses to be
assigned in basic networking mode.

Another alternative with advanced networking in this scenario is to play
some games with NAT (which is what we currently recommend to our customers).
SSL bindings must be unique but not with IP, just with port & IP. Our
workaround is to have clients bind SSL certs to unique ports internally and
then map 443 on the public address to something like 1443, 1444, 1445, etc
on the inside. I agree, it's a hack as well but it stays within the
confines with what CloudStack permits and has control over.

Another way to handle this in an advanced zone would be to allow the NAT
mapping to not only allow you to tie to a specific instance but perhaps to a
free-form field where one can simply specify the internal address to map to.
So that way even though the virtual router can't assign multiple IP
addresses via DHCP, it gives the user the ability to specify a custom
internal address to map to. And perhaps in the process, exclude that
internal address from the DHCP pool so it doesn't get assigned to another
instance creating a conflict.

-----Original Message-----
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 6:21 AM
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

This is not the most elegant solution but it's works.

In the root home of the virtual router you have all cloudstack scripts.

This are the steps to change it :

mv /root/ipassoc.sh /root/ipassoc_orig.sh

Then i create my own ipassoc.sh and i add this :


#!/bin/bash

cd /root

/bin/bash /root/ipassoc_orig.sh $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9

/root/ipassoc_orig.sh -A -l PUBLICIP -c eth2 -g PublicGATEWAY
/root/firewall.sh -A -l PUBLICIP -r 10.1.1.2 -d 0:0 -G

/root/ipassoc_orig.sh -A -l XX.XX.XX.XX -c eth2 -g XX.XX.XX.XX
/root/firewall.sh -A -l XX.XX.XX.XX -r 10.1.1.3 -d 0:0 -G

Then

chmod +x ipassoc.sh



Then i use the firewall of cloudstack panel to open the Ports of this


I hope that you understand this



2012/11/16 Geoff Higginbottom <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org>

> This gets my vote
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this
> to happen.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made
> nat
> 1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm as
> eth0:1, eth0:2.
>
> Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
>
> I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this.
> > I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on
> > the same
> VM.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> > > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want
> > > to know
> > is
> > > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an
> > > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> > > IP's to one instance.
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> > > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > > privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > > used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient
> > > please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
> > > The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > > own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > > Internet Ltd or associated
> companies.
> > >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------
> This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
> other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the
> sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent
> expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily
> representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated
companies.
>
> ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and
> implementation services to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises
> to build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue's expertise, combined
> with CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> Enterprises to deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or
end-user.
>
> ________________________________
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact
> the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape
> Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Musayev, Ilya
2012-11-16 16:47:29 UTC
Permalink
+1 for Jonathan's approach.

My opinion, this should be handled by the user and not dhcp scope.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:36 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I have advanced network (I use vlans).

My idea of working would be to DHCP the first ip but allocate the next X amount to the VPS to allow the user to manually add them to the OS themselves. Thus limiting the changes to Cloudstack and also working within the boundaries of DHCP.

-----Original Message-----
From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 16 November 2012 16:31
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

That makes sense, however it only works with advanced networking and I believe the original post to this was to allow multiple IP addresses to be assigned in basic networking mode.

Another alternative with advanced networking in this scenario is to play some games with NAT (which is what we currently recommend to our customers).
SSL bindings must be unique but not with IP, just with port & IP. Our workaround is to have clients bind SSL certs to unique ports internally and then map 443 on the public address to something like 1443, 1444, 1445, etc on the inside. I agree, it's a hack as well but it stays within the confines with what CloudStack permits and has control over.

Another way to handle this in an advanced zone would be to allow the NAT mapping to not only allow you to tie to a specific instance but perhaps to a free-form field where one can simply specify the internal address to map to.
So that way even though the virtual router can't assign multiple IP addresses via DHCP, it gives the user the ability to specify a custom internal address to map to. And perhaps in the process, exclude that internal address from the DHCP pool so it doesn't get assigned to another instance creating a conflict.

-----Original Message-----
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 6:21 AM
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

This is not the most elegant solution but it's works.

In the root home of the virtual router you have all cloudstack scripts.

This are the steps to change it :

mv /root/ipassoc.sh /root/ipassoc_orig.sh

Then i create my own ipassoc.sh and i add this :


#!/bin/bash

cd /root

/bin/bash /root/ipassoc_orig.sh $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9

/root/ipassoc_orig.sh -A -l PUBLICIP -c eth2 -g PublicGATEWAY /root/firewall.sh -A -l PUBLICIP -r 10.1.1.2 -d 0:0 -G

/root/ipassoc_orig.sh -A -l XX.XX.XX.XX -c eth2 -g XX.XX.XX.XX /root/firewall.sh -A -l XX.XX.XX.XX -r 10.1.1.3 -d 0:0 -G

Then

chmod +x ipassoc.sh



Then i use the firewall of cloudstack panel to open the Ports of this


I hope that you understand this



2012/11/16 Geoff Higginbottom <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org>

> This gets my vote
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this
> to happen.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made
> nat
> 1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm as
> eth0:1, eth0:2.
>
> Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
>
> I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this.
> > I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on
> > the same
> VM.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> > > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want
> > > to know
> > is
> > > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an
> > > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> > > IP's to one instance.
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> > > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > > privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > > used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient
> > > please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
> > > The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > > own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > > Internet Ltd or associated
> companies.
> > >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------
> This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
> other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the
> sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent
> expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily
> representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated
companies.
>
> ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and
> implementation services to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises
> to build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue's expertise, combined
> with CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> Enterprises to deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or
end-user.
>
> ________________________________
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact
> the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape
> Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Jonathan Bastin
2012-11-16 17:01:47 UTC
Permalink
This would need to work with shared networks as well.

If anyone is interested how how to get a public IP on a guest with advanced network please ask.

----- Reply message -----
From: "Musayev, Ilya" <imusayev-***@public.gmane.org>
To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org" <cloudstack-users-***@public.gmane.orgche.org>
Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
Date: Fri, Nov 16, 2012 16:50



+1 for Jonathan's approach.

My opinion, this should be handled by the user and not dhcp scope.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:36 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I have advanced network (I use vlans).

My idea of working would be to DHCP the first ip but allocate the next X amount to the VPS to allow the user to manually add them to the OS themselves. Thus limiting the changes to Cloudstack and also working within the boundaries of DHCP.

-----Original Message-----
From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 16 November 2012 16:31
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

That makes sense, however it only works with advanced networking and I believe the original post to this was to allow multiple IP addresses to be assigned in basic networking mode.

Another alternative with advanced networking in this scenario is to play some games with NAT (which is what we currently recommend to our customers).
SSL bindings must be unique but not with IP, just with port & IP. Our workaround is to have clients bind SSL certs to unique ports internally and then map 443 on the public address to something like 1443, 1444, 1445, etc on the inside. I agree, it's a hack as well but it stays within the confines with what CloudStack permits and has control over.

Another way to handle this in an advanced zone would be to allow the NAT mapping to not only allow you to tie to a specific instance but perhaps to a free-form field where one can simply specify the internal address to map to.
So that way even though the virtual router can't assign multiple IP addresses via DHCP, it gives the user the ability to specify a custom internal address to map to. And perhaps in the process, exclude that internal address from the DHCP pool so it doesn't get assigned to another instance creating a conflict.

-----Original Message-----
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 6:21 AM
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

This is not the most elegant solution but it's works.

In the root home of the virtual router you have all cloudstack scripts.

This are the steps to change it :

mv /root/ipassoc.sh /root/ipassoc_orig.sh

Then i create my own ipassoc.sh and i add this :


#!/bin/bash

cd /root

/bin/bash /root/ipassoc_orig.sh $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9

/root/ipassoc_orig.sh -A -l PUBLICIP -c eth2 -g PublicGATEWAY /root/firewall.sh -A -l PUBLICIP -r 10.1.1.2 -d 0:0 -G

/root/ipassoc_orig.sh -A -l XX.XX.XX.XX -c eth2 -g XX.XX.XX.XX /root/firewall.sh -A -l XX.XX.XX.XX -r 10.1.1.3 -d 0:0 -G

Then

chmod +x ipassoc.sh



Then i use the firewall of cloudstack panel to open the Ports of this


I hope that you understand this



2012/11/16 Geoff Higginbottom <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org>

> This gets my vote
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this
> to happen.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made
> nat
> 1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm as
> eth0:1, eth0:2.
>
> Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
>
> I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this.
> > I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on
> > the same
> VM.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> > > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want
> > > to know
> > is
> > > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an
> > > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> > > IP's to one instance.
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> > > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > > privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > > used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient
> > > please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
> > > The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > > own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > > Internet Ltd or associated
> companies.
> > >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------
> This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
> other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the
> sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent
> expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily
> representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated
companies.
>
> ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and
> implementation services to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises
> to build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue's expertise, combined
> with CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> Enterprises to deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or
end-user.
>
> ________________________________
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact
> the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape
> Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Jayapal Reddy Uradi
2012-11-19 11:50:13 UTC
Permalink
I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'. Hope fully it will come in 4.1 release.

Thanks,
Jayapal

> On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> >This gets my vote
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Geoff
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this to
> >happen.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> >To: cloudstack-users
> >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made nat
> >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm as
> >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> >
> >Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> >
> >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> >
> >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >>
> >> Jonathan
> >>
> >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this.
> >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on
> >> the same
> >VM.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> >>
> >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to
> >> > know
> >> is
> >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an
> >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> >> > IP's to one instance.
> >> >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -
> >> ----------------------------------------------------
> >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
> >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the
> >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's
> >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not
> >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd
> >> > or associated
> >companies.
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >---
> >------------------------------------------------ This email (including
> >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It
> >may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be
> >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the
> >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from
> >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are
> >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> >
> >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and
> >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises to
> >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise, combined with
> >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises to
> >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> >
> >________________________________
> >
> >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> >intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the
> >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> >based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact
> >the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape
> >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> >
>
Jonathan Bastin
2012-11-19 11:54:42 UTC
Permalink
Cool look forward to it.

Regards,


Jonathan Bastin
07739668262

----- Reply message -----
From: "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" <jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org" <cloudstack-users-***@public.gmane.orgche.org>
Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 11:53



I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'. Hope fully it will come in 4.1 release.

Thanks,
Jayapal

> On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> >This gets my vote
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Geoff
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this to
> >happen.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> >To: cloudstack-users
> >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made nat
> >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm as
> >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> >
> >Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> >
> >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> >
> >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote on it.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >>
> >> Jonathan
> >>
> >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for this.
> >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP on
> >> the same
> >VM.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> >>
> >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want to
> >> > know
> >> is
> >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an
> >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> >> > IP's to one instance.
> >> >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -
> >> ----------------------------------------------------
> >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
> >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the
> >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's
> >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not
> >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd
> >> > or associated
> >companies.
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >---
> >------------------------------------------------ This email (including
> >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It
> >may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be
> >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the
> >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from
> >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are
> >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> >
> >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and
> >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises to
> >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise, combined with
> >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises to
> >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> >
> >________________________________
> >
> >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> >intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the
> >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> >based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact
> >the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape
> >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> >
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Anthony Xu
2012-11-19 18:17:52 UTC
Permalink
'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'

Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more than one IPs on this guest NIC?

Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?


Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'. Hope
> fully it will come in 4.1 release.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
> > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > >This gets my vote
> > >
> > >Regards
> > >
> > >Geoff
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >
> > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this
> to
> > >happen.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >
> > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made
> nat
> > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm
> as
> > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >
> > >Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >
> > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >
> > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote
> on it.
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan
> > >>
> > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for
> this.
> > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP
> on
> > >> the same
> > >VM.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >>
> > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want
> to
> > >> > know
> > >> is
> > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an
> > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> >
> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> > >> -
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> privileged
> > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by
> any
> > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact
> the
> > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's
> > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not
> > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet
> Ltd
> > >> > or associated
> > >companies.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> > >---
> > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> (including
> > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> It
> > >may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be
> > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not
> the
> > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from
> > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts
> are
> > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer
> Point
> > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and
> > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises
> to
> > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise, combined
> with
> > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises
> to
> > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >
> > >________________________________
> > >
> > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> > >intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> addressed.
> > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and
> do
> > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not
> the
> > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> > >based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
> contact
> > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> Shape
> > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >
> >
Jonathan Bastin
2012-11-19 18:35:21 UTC
Permalink
It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic

Regards,


Jonathan Bastin
07739668262

----- Reply message -----
From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org" <cloudstack-users-***@public.gmane.orgche.org>
Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21



'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'

Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more than one IPs on this guest NIC?

Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?


Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'. Hope
> fully it will come in 4.1 release.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
> > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > >This gets my vote
> > >
> > >Regards
> > >
> > >Geoff
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >
> > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this
> to
> > >happen.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >
> > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made
> nat
> > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm
> as
> > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >
> > >Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >
> > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >
> > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote
> on it.
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan
> > >>
> > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for
> this.
> > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP
> on
> > >> the same
> > >VM.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >>
> > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want
> to
> > >> > know
> > >> is
> > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an
> > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> >
> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> > >> -
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> privileged
> > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by
> any
> > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact
> the
> > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's
> > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not
> > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet
> Ltd
> > >> > or associated
> > >companies.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> > >---
> > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> (including
> > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> It
> > >may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be
> > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not
> the
> > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from
> > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts
> are
> > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer
> Point
> > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and
> > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises
> to
> > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise, combined
> with
> > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises
> to
> > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >
> > >________________________________
> > >
> > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> > >intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> addressed.
> > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and
> do
> > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not
> the
> > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> > >based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
> contact
> > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> Shape
> > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >
> >

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Matthew Hartmann
2012-11-21 16:54:28 UTC
Permalink
What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per VM without
having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if I'm hosting a
shared web server and need to host multiple SSL websites, I'm going to need
not just multiple public IPs but multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I
believe this would be easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.

Matthew Hartmann
Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E: mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org

TLS.NET, Inc.
http://www.tls.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic

Regards,


Jonathan Bastin
07739668262

----- Reply message -----
From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
<cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21



'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'

Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more than one IPs
on this guest NIC?

Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?


Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'. Hope
> fully it will come in 4.1 release.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
> > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > >This gets my vote
> > >
> > >Regards
> > >
> > >Geoff
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >
> > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get this
> to
> > >happen.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >
> > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only made
> nat
> > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the vm
> as
> > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >
> > >Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >
> > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >
> > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can vote
> on it.
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan
> > >>
> > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for
> this.
> > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP
> on
> > >> the same
> > >VM.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >>
> > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation advanced
> > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I want
> to
> > >> > know
> > >> is
> > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using an
> > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say 5
> > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> >
> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> > >> -
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> privileged
> > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by
> any
> > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact
> the
> > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's
> > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not
> > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet
> Ltd
> > >> > or associated
> > >companies.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> > >---
> > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> (including
> > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> It
> > >may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be
> > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not
> the
> > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from
> > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts
> are
> > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer
> Point
> > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and
> > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises
> to
> > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise, combined
> with
> > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises
> to
> > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >
> > >________________________________
> > >
> > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> > >intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> addressed.
> > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and
> do
> > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not
> the
> > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> > >based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
> contact
> > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> Shape
> > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >
> >

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not
necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
associated companies.
Anthony Xu
2012-11-21 17:34:51 UTC
Permalink
CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.


Anthony



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per VM
> without
> having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if I'm hosting a
> shared web server and need to host multiple SSL websites, I'm going to
> need
> not just multiple public IPs but multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO,
> I
> believe this would be easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one
> VIF.
>
> Matthew Hartmann
> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E: mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
>
> TLS.NET, Inc.
> http://www.tls.net
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Jonathan Bastin
> 07739668262
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
>
>
>
> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
>
> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more than
> one IPs
> on this guest NIC?
>
> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
>
>
> Anthony
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> Hope
> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jayapal
> >
> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > >This gets my vote
> > > >
> > > >Regards
> > > >
> > > >Geoff
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > > >
> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get
> this
> > to
> > > >happen.
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > > >
> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only
> made
> > nat
> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the
> vm
> > as
> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > > >
> > > >Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > > >
> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > > >
> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can
> vote
> > on it.
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > > >>
> > > >> Jonathan
> > > >>
> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for
> > this.
> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP
> > on
> > > >> the same
> > > >VM.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > > >>
> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> advanced
> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I
> want
> > to
> > > >> > know
> > > >> is
> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using
> an
> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say
> 5
> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > > >> >
> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > ---
> > > >> -
> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for
> the
> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > privileged
> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used
> by
> > any
> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> contact
> > the
> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's
> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and
> not
> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet
> > Ltd
> > > >> > or associated
> > > >companies.
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > ---
> > > >---
> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > (including
> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> > It
> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and should not
> be
> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not
> > the
> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email
> from
> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> thoughts
> > are
> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer
> > Point
> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > > >
> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting
> and
> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> Enterprises
> > to
> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise, combined
> > with
> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises
> > to
> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > > >
> > > >________________________________
> > > >
> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> > > >intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> > addressed.
> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and
> > do
> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not
> > the
> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> > > >based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
> > contact
> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> > Shape
> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > > >
> > >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> ---------------------------------------------- This email (including
> any
> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
> contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
> copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
> recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your
> system.
> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> and not
> necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
> associated companies.
Anthony Xu
2012-11-21 17:36:14 UTC
Permalink
And it is hard to implement anti-spoofing if one User VM NIC has multiple IP.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Xu
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:35 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
>
>
> Anthony
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> > What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per VM
> > without
> > having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if I'm hosting
> a
> > shared web server and need to host multiple SSL websites, I'm going
> to
> > need
> > not just multiple public IPs but multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO,
> > I
> > believe this would be easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on
> one
> > VIF.
> >
> > Matthew Hartmann
> > Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E: mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> >
> > TLS.NET, Inc.
> > http://www.tls.net
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> > It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Jonathan Bastin
> > 07739668262
> >
> > ----- Reply message -----
> > From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> >
> >
> >
> > 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> >
> > Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more than
> > one IPs
> > on this guest NIC?
> >
> > Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> >
> >
> > Anthony
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >
> > > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > Hope
> > > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jayapal
> > >
> > > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >This gets my vote
> > > > >
> > > > >Regards
> > > > >
> > > > >Geoff
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > > > >
> > > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get
> > this
> > > to
> > > > >happen.
> > > > >
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > > > >
> > > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only
> > made
> > > nat
> > > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the
> > vm
> > > as
> > > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > > > >
> > > > >Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > > > >
> > > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > > > >
> > > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can
> > vote
> > > on it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Jonathan
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for
> > > this.
> > > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open
> IP
> > > on
> > > > >> the same
> > > > >VM.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > advanced
> > > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I
> > want
> > > to
> > > > >> > know
> > > > >> is
> > > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> using
> > an
> > > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign
> say
> > 5
> > > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > --
> > > ---
> > > > >> -
> > > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for
> > the
> > > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > > privileged
> > > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used
> > by
> > > any
> > > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > contact
> > > the
> > > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's
> > > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and
> > not
> > > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> Internet
> > > Ltd
> > > > >> > or associated
> > > > >companies.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > --
> > > ---
> > > > >---
> > > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > > (including
> > > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above.
> > > It
> > > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> not
> > be
> > > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are
> not
> > > the
> > > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email
> > from
> > > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > thoughts
> > > are
> > > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> Peer
> > > Point
> > > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > > > >
> > > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting
> > and
> > > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > Enterprises
> > > to
> > > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise, combined
> > > with
> > > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> Enterprises
> > > to
> > > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > > > >
> > > > >________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> > > > >intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> > > addressed.
> > > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author
> and
> > > do
> > > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are
> not
> > > the
> > > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> action
> > > > >based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
> > > contact
> > > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> > > Shape
> > > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > -----
> > ---------------------------------------------- This email (including
> > any
> > attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It
> may
> > contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
> > copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the
> named
> > recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your
> > system.
> > The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > and not
> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
> > associated companies.
Chip Childers
2012-11-21 17:36:49 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.

Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
IPs per NIC.

> Anthony
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
>> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
>> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>>
>> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per VM
>> without
>> having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if I'm hosting a
>> shared web server and need to host multiple SSL websites, I'm going to
>> need
>> not just multiple public IPs but multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO,
>> I
>> believe this would be easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one
>> VIF.
>>
>> Matthew Hartmann
>> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E: mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
>>
>> TLS.NET, Inc.
>> http://www.tls.net
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
>> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
>> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
>> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>>
>> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Jonathan Bastin
>> 07739668262
>>
>> ----- Reply message -----
>> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
>> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
>> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
>> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
>> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
>>
>>
>>
>> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
>>
>> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more than
>> one IPs
>> on this guest NIC?
>>
>> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
>>
>>
>> Anthony
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
>> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
>> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
>> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>> >
>> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
>> Hope
>> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Jayapal
>> >
>> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
>> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >This gets my vote
>> > > >
>> > > >Regards
>> > > >
>> > > >Geoff
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >-----Original Message-----
>> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
>> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
>> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
>> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
>> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>> > > >
>> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get
>> this
>> > to
>> > > >happen.
>> > > >
>> > > >-----Original Message-----
>> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
>> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
>> > > >To: cloudstack-users
>> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>> > > >
>> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only
>> made
>> > nat
>> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the
>> vm
>> > as
>> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
>> > > >
>> > > >Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
>> > > >
>> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
>> > > >
>> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can
>> vote
>> > on it.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
>> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
>> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
>> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Jonathan
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for
>> > this.
>> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP
>> > on
>> > > >> the same
>> > > >VM.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
>> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
>> advanced
>> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I
>> want
>> > to
>> > > >> > know
>> > > >> is
>> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using
>> an
>> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say
>> 5
>> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> --
>> > ---
>> > > >> -
>> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for
>> the
>> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
>> > privileged
>> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used
>> by
>> > any
>> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
>> contact
>> > the
>> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's
>> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and
>> not
>> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet
>> > Ltd
>> > > >> > or associated
>> > > >companies.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --
>> > ---
>> > > >---
>> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
>> > (including
>> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
>> > It
>> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and should not
>> be
>> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not
>> > the
>> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email
>> from
>> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
>> thoughts
>> > are
>> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer
>> > Point
>> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
>> > > >
>> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting
>> and
>> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
>> Enterprises
>> > to
>> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise, combined
>> > with
>> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises
>> > to
>> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
>> > > >
>> > > >________________________________
>> > > >
>> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>> > > >intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
>> > addressed.
>> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and
>> > do
>> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not
>> > the
>> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
>> > > >based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
>> > contact
>> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
>> > Shape
>> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
>> > > >
>> > >
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -----
>> ---------------------------------------------- This email (including
>> any
>> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
>> contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
>> copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
>> recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your
>> system.
>> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
>> and not
>> necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
>> associated companies.
>
>
Facundo Guerrero
2012-11-21 17:49:59 UTC
Permalink
KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes ip's
on the same nic.

*Facundo Guerrero*
*System Administrator*
*IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
*www.ipaddress.com.ar*




2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>

> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
>
> Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> IPs per NIC.
>
> > Anthony
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >>
> >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per VM
> >> without
> >> having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if I'm hosting a
> >> shared web server and need to host multiple SSL websites, I'm going to
> >> need
> >> not just multiple public IPs but multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO,
> >> I
> >> believe this would be easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one
> >> VIF.
> >>
> >> Matthew Hartmann
> >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E: mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> >>
> >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> >> http://www.tls.net
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >>
> >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >> Jonathan Bastin
> >> 07739668262
> >>
> >> ----- Reply message -----
> >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> >>
> >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more than
> >> one IPs
> >> on this guest NIC?
> >>
> >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> >>
> >>
> >> Anthony
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >> >
> >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> >> Hope
> >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Jayapal
> >> >
> >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >This gets my vote
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Regards
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Geoff
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get
> >> this
> >> > to
> >> > > >happen.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >> > > >
> >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only
> >> made
> >> > nat
> >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the
> >> vm
> >> > as
> >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> >> > > >
> >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can
> >> vote
> >> > on it.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Jonathan
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for
> >> > this.
> >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP
> >> > on
> >> > > >> the same
> >> > > >VM.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> >> advanced
> >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I
> >> want
> >> > to
> >> > > >> > know
> >> > > >> is
> >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using
> >> an
> >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say
> >> 5
> >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --
> >> > ---
> >> > > >> -
> >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for
> >> the
> >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> >> > privileged
> >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used
> >> by
> >> > any
> >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> >> contact
> >> > the
> >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's
> >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and
> >> not
> >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet
> >> > Ltd
> >> > > >> > or associated
> >> > > >companies.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --
> >> > ---
> >> > > >---
> >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> >> > (including
> >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> >> > It
> >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and should not
> >> be
> >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not
> >> > the
> >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email
> >> from
> >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> >> thoughts
> >> > are
> >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer
> >> > Point
> >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting
> >> and
> >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> >> Enterprises
> >> > to
> >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise, combined
> >> > with
> >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises
> >> > to
> >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >________________________________
> >> > > >
> >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> >> > > >intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> >> > addressed.
> >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and
> >> > do
> >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not
> >> > the
> >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> >> > > >based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
> >> > contact
> >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> >> > Shape
> >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -----
> >> ---------------------------------------------- This email (including
> >> any
> >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
> >> contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
> >> copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
> >> recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your
> >> system.
> >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> >> and not
> >> necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
> >> associated companies.
> >
> >
>
Clayton Weise
2012-11-21 18:22:43 UTC
Permalink
Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It just seems easier

-----Original Message-----
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes ip's
on the same nic.

*Facundo Guerrero*
*System Administrator*
*IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
*www.ipaddress.com.ar*




2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>

> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
>
> Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> IPs per NIC.
>
> > Anthony
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >>
> >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per VM
> >> without
> >> having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if I'm hosting a
> >> shared web server and need to host multiple SSL websites, I'm going to
> >> need
> >> not just multiple public IPs but multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO,
> >> I
> >> believe this would be easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one
> >> VIF.
> >>
> >> Matthew Hartmann
> >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E: mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> >>
> >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> >> http://www.tls.net
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >>
> >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >> Jonathan Bastin
> >> 07739668262
> >>
> >> ----- Reply message -----
> >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> >>
> >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more than
> >> one IPs
> >> on this guest NIC?
> >>
> >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> >>
> >>
> >> Anthony
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >> >
> >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> >> Hope
> >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Jayapal
> >> >
> >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >This gets my vote
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Regards
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Geoff
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can get
> >> this
> >> > to
> >> > > >happen.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >> > > >
> >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only
> >> made
> >> > nat
> >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into the
> >> vm
> >> > as
> >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Jira link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> >> > > >
> >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can
> >> vote
> >> > on it.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Jonathan
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking for
> >> > this.
> >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that open IP
> >> > on
> >> > > >> the same
> >> > > >VM.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> >> advanced
> >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What I
> >> want
> >> > to
> >> > > >> > know
> >> > > >> is
> >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without using
> >> an
> >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign say
> >> 5
> >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --
> >> > ---
> >> > > >> -
> >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for
> >> the
> >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> >> > privileged
> >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used
> >> by
> >> > any
> >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> >> contact
> >> > the
> >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's
> >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and
> >> not
> >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet
> >> > Ltd
> >> > > >> > or associated
> >> > > >companies.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --
> >> > ---
> >> > > >---
> >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> >> > (including
> >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> >> > It
> >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and should not
> >> be
> >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not
> >> > the
> >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email
> >> from
> >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> >> thoughts
> >> > are
> >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer
> >> > Point
> >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting
> >> and
> >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> >> Enterprises
> >> > to
> >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise, combined
> >> > with
> >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises
> >> > to
> >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >________________________________
> >> > > >
> >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> >> > > >intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> >> > addressed.
> >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and
> >> > do
> >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not
> >> > the
> >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> >> > > >based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
> >> > contact
> >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> >> > Shape
> >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -----
> >> ---------------------------------------------- This email (including
> >> any
> >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
> >> contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
> >> copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
> >> recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your
> >> system.
> >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> >> and not
> >> necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
> >> associated companies.
> >
> >
>
Jonathan Bastin
2012-11-21 19:10:40 UTC
Permalink
I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest way
and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release 4.1 if it
makes it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to anything
else and let the user manually add that second address? It just seems
easier

-----Original Message-----
From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
To: cloudstack-users
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes ip's
on the same nic.

*Facundo Guerrero*
*System Administrator*
*IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
*www.ipaddress.com.ar*




2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>

> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
>
> Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> IPs per NIC.
>
> > Anthony
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >>
> >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per VM
> >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> >>
> >> Matthew Hartmann
> >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> >>
> >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> >> http://www.tls.net
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >>
> >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >> Jonathan Bastin
> >> 07739668262
> >>
> >> ----- Reply message -----
> >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> >>
> >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> >>
> >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> >>
> >>
> >> Anthony
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >> >
> >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> >> Hope
> >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Jayapal
> >> >
> >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >This gets my vote
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Regards
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Geoff
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> >> > > >get
> >> this
> >> > to
> >> > > >happen.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >> > > >
> >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i only
> >> made
> >> > nat
> >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> >> > > >the
> >> vm
> >> > as
> >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Jira link >
> >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> >> > > >
> >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we can
> >> vote
> >> > on it.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Jonathan
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> >> > > >> for
> >> > this.
> >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> >> > > >> open IP
> >> > on
> >> > > >> the same
> >> > > >VM.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> >> advanced
> >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What
> >> > > >> > I
> >> want
> >> > to
> >> > > >> > know
> >> > > >> is
> >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> >> > > >> > using
> >> an
> >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to assign
> >> > > >> > say
> >> 5
> >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >> ----
> >> --
> >> > ---
> >> > > >> -
> >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> >> > > >> > for
> >> the
> >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> >> > privileged
> >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> >> > > >> > used
> >> by
> >> > any
> >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> >> contact
> >> > the
> >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The author's
> >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> >> > > >> > and
> >> not
> >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> >> > > >> > Internet
> >> > Ltd
> >> > > >> > or associated
> >> > > >companies.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >----
> >> --
> >> > ---
> >> > > >---
> >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> >> > (including
> >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
above.
> >> > It
> >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> >> > > >not
> >> be
> >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are
> >> > > >not
> >> > the
> >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email
> >> from
> >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> >> thoughts
> >> > are
> >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> >> > > >Peer
> >> > Point
> >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> >> > > >consulting
> >> and
> >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> >> Enterprises
> >> > to
> >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> >> > > >combined
> >> > with
> >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> >> > > >Enterprises
> >> > to
> >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >________________________________
> >> > > >
> >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> >> > > >is
> >> > addressed.
> >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author
> >> > > >and
> >> > do
> >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are
> >> > > >not
> >> > the
> >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> >> > > >Please
> >> > contact
> >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> >> > Shape
> >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ----
> >> -----
> >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> >> (including any
> >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It
> >> may contain confidential or privileged information and should not
> >> be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are
> >> not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> >> email from your system.
> >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> >
> >
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Anthony Xu
2012-11-21 19:28:36 UTC
Permalink
Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second IP will not work because of anti-spoofing.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> way
> and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release 4.1
> if it
> makes it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
> necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
> anything
> else and let the user manually add that second address? It just seems
> easier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
> ip's
> on the same nic.
>
> *Facundo Guerrero*
> *System Administrator*
> *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
> Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
> GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
> fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
> *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
> >
> > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> > IPs per NIC.
> >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
> VM
> > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> > >>
> > >> Matthew Hartmann
> > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> > >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> > >>
> > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> > >> http://www.tls.net
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan Bastin
> > >> 07739668262
> > >>
> > >> ----- Reply message -----
> > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> > >>
> > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> > >>
> > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Anthony
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> >
> > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > >> Hope
> > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Jayapal
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >This gets my vote
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Regards
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Geoff
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> > >> > > >get
> > >> this
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >happen.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
> only
> > >> made
> > >> > nat
> > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> > >> > > >the
> > >> vm
> > >> > as
> > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Jira link >
> > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
> can
> > >> vote
> > >> > on it.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Jonathan
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> > >> > > >> for
> > >> > this.
> > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> > >> > > >> open IP
> > >> > on
> > >> > > >> the same
> > >> > > >VM.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > >> advanced
> > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What
> > >> > > >> > I
> > >> want
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >> > know
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> > >> > > >> > using
> > >> an
> > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
> assign
> > >> > > >> > say
> > >> 5
> > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > >> > > >> ----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >> -
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> > >> > > >> > for
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > >> > privileged
> > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > >> > > >> > used
> > >> by
> > >> > any
> > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > >> contact
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
> author's
> > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > >> > > >> > and
> > >> not
> > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> > > >> > Internet
> > >> > Ltd
> > >> > > >> > or associated
> > >> > > >companies.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > >> > > >----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >---
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > >> > (including
> > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above.
> > >> > It
> > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> > >> > > >not
> > >> be
> > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> email
> > >> from
> > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > >> thoughts
> > >> > are
> > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> > >> > > >Peer
> > >> > Point
> > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> > >> > > >consulting
> > >> and
> > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > >> Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> > >> > > >combined
> > >> > with
> > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> > >> > > >Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >________________________________
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> > >> > > >is
> > >> > addressed.
> > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author
> > >> > > >and
> > >> > do
> > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> > >> > > >Please
> > >> > contact
> > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> error.
> > >> > Shape
> > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > >> ----
> > >> -----
> > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> > >> (including any
> > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It
> > >> may contain confidential or privileged information and should not
> > >> be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are
> > >> not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> > >> email from your system.
> > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------- This email
> (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are
> not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email
> from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of
> the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Jonathan Bastin
2012-11-21 19:34:39 UTC
Permalink
I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest
network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a shared and
an isolated network.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:29
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If
that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second IP
will not work because of anti-spoofing.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> way and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release
> 4.1 if it makes it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
> necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
> anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It
> just seems easier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
> ip's on the same nic.
>
> *Facundo Guerrero*
> *System Administrator*
> *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
> Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
> GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
> fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
> *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
> >
> > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> > IPs per NIC.
> >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
> VM
> > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> > >>
> > >> Matthew Hartmann
> > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> > >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> > >>
> > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> > >> http://www.tls.net
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan Bastin
> > >> 07739668262
> > >>
> > >> ----- Reply message -----
> > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> > >>
> > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> > >>
> > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Anthony
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> > >> > [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> >
> > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > >> Hope
> > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Jayapal
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >This gets my vote
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Regards
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Geoff
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> > >> > > >get
> > >> this
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >happen.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
> only
> > >> made
> > >> > nat
> > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> > >> > > >the
> > >> vm
> > >> > as
> > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Jira link >
> > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
> can
> > >> vote
> > >> > on it.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Jonathan
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> > >> > > >> for
> > >> > this.
> > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> > >> > > >> open IP
> > >> > on
> > >> > > >> the same
> > >> > > >VM.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > >> advanced
> > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network.
> > >> > > >> > What I
> > >> want
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >> > know
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> > >> > > >> > using
> > >> an
> > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
> assign
> > >> > > >> > say
> > >> 5
> > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> -
> -
> > >> > > >> ----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >> -
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> > >> > > >> > for
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > >> > privileged
> > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > >> > > >> > used
> > >> by
> > >> > any
> > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > >> contact
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
> author's
> > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > >> > > >> > and
> > >> not
> > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> > > >> > Internet
> > >> > Ltd
> > >> > > >> > or associated
> > >> > > >companies.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >-
> -
> > >> > > >----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >---
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > >> > (including
> > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above.
> > >> > It
> > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and
> > >> > > >should not
> > >> be
> > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> email
> > >> from
> > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > >> thoughts
> > >> > are
> > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> > >> > > >Peer
> > >> > Point
> > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> > >> > > >consulting
> > >> and
> > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > >> Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> > >> > > >combined
> > >> > with
> > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> > >> > > >Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >________________________________
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> > >> > > >is
> > >> > addressed.
> > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author
> > >> > > >and
> > >> > do
> > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you
> > >> > > >are not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> > >> > > >Please
> > >> > contact
> > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> error.
> > >> > Shape
> > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -
> -
> > >> ----
> > >> -----
> > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> > >> (including any
> > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> > >> It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> > >> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> > >> are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> > >> the email from your system.
> > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --------------------------------------------------- This email
> (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
> named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and
> should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If
> you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views
> and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those
> of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Boylan, James
2012-11-21 19:37:07 UTC
Permalink
I don't actually see the benefit of this. It really goes against the whole point of a Cloud environment. You shouldn't find yourself in a situation where you need multiple IPs per interface.

-- James

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a shared and an isolated network.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:29
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second IP will not work because of anti-spoofing.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> way and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release
> 4.1 if it makes it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
> necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
> anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It
> just seems easier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
> ip's on the same nic.
>
> *Facundo Guerrero*
> *System Administrator*
> *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
> Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
> GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
> fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
> *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
> >
> > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> > IPs per NIC.
> >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
> VM
> > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> > >>
> > >> Matthew Hartmann
> > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> > >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> > >>
> > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> > >> http://www.tls.net
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan Bastin
> > >> 07739668262
> > >>
> > >> ----- Reply message -----
> > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> > >>
> > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> > >>
> > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Anthony
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> > >> > [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> >
> > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > >> Hope
> > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Jayapal
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >This gets my vote
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Regards
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Geoff
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> > >> > > >get
> > >> this
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >happen.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
> only
> > >> made
> > >> > nat
> > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> > >> > > >the
> > >> vm
> > >> > as
> > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Jira link >
> > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
> can
> > >> vote
> > >> > on it.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Jonathan
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> > >> > > >> for
> > >> > this.
> > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> > >> > > >> open IP
> > >> > on
> > >> > > >> the same
> > >> > > >VM.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > >> advanced
> > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network.
> > >> > > >> > What I
> > >> want
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >> > know
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> > >> > > >> > using
> > >> an
> > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
> assign
> > >> > > >> > say
> > >> 5
> > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> -
> -
> > >> > > >> ----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >> -
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> > >> > > >> > for
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > >> > privileged
> > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > >> > > >> > used
> > >> by
> > >> > any
> > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > >> contact
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
> author's
> > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > >> > > >> > and
> > >> not
> > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> > > >> > Internet
> > >> > Ltd
> > >> > > >> > or associated
> > >> > > >companies.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >-
> -
> > >> > > >----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >---
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > >> > (including
> > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above.
> > >> > It
> > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and
> > >> > > >should not
> > >> be
> > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> email
> > >> from
> > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > >> thoughts
> > >> > are
> > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> > >> > > >Peer
> > >> > Point
> > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> > >> > > >consulting
> > >> and
> > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > >> Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> > >> > > >combined
> > >> > with
> > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> > >> > > >Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >________________________________
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> > >> > > >is
> > >> > addressed.
> > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author
> > >> > > >and
> > >> > do
> > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you
> > >> > > >are not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> > >> > > >Please
> > >> > contact
> > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> error.
> > >> > Shape
> > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -
> -
> > >> ----
> > >> -----
> > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> > >> (including any
> > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> > >> It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> > >> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> > >> are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> > >> the email from your system.
> > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --------------------------------------------------- This email
> (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
> named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and
> should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If
> you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views
> and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those
> of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Jonathan Bastin
2012-11-21 19:41:19 UTC
Permalink
But if customer requests it then you need to provide it. May people use IP
locking than port locking for SSL certs.

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:37
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I don't actually see the benefit of this. It really goes against the whole
point of a Cloud environment. You shouldn't find yourself in a situation
where you need multiple IPs per interface.

-- James

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest
network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a shared and
an isolated network.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:29
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If
that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second IP
will not work because of anti-spoofing.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> way and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release
> 4.1 if it makes it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
> necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
> anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It
> just seems easier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
> ip's on the same nic.
>
> *Facundo Guerrero*
> *System Administrator*
> *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
> Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
> GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
> fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
> *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
> >
> > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> > IPs per NIC.
> >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
> VM
> > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> > >>
> > >> Matthew Hartmann
> > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> > >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> > >>
> > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> > >> http://www.tls.net
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan Bastin
> > >> 07739668262
> > >>
> > >> ----- Reply message -----
> > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> > >>
> > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> > >>
> > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Anthony
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> > >> > [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> >
> > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > >> Hope
> > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Jayapal
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >This gets my vote
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Regards
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Geoff
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> > >> > > >get
> > >> this
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >happen.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
> only
> > >> made
> > >> > nat
> > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> > >> > > >the
> > >> vm
> > >> > as
> > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Jira link >
> > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
> can
> > >> vote
> > >> > on it.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Jonathan
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> > >> > > >> for
> > >> > this.
> > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> > >> > > >> open IP
> > >> > on
> > >> > > >> the same
> > >> > > >VM.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > >> advanced
> > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network.
> > >> > > >> > What I
> > >> want
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >> > know
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> > >> > > >> > using
> > >> an
> > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
> assign
> > >> > > >> > say
> > >> 5
> > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> -
> -
> > >> > > >> ----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >> -
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> > >> > > >> > for
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > >> > privileged
> > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > >> > > >> > used
> > >> by
> > >> > any
> > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > >> contact
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
> author's
> > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > >> > > >> > and
> > >> not
> > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> > > >> > Internet
> > >> > Ltd
> > >> > > >> > or associated
> > >> > > >companies.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >-
> -
> > >> > > >----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >---
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > >> > (including
> > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above.
> > >> > It
> > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and
> > >> > > >should not
> > >> be
> > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> email
> > >> from
> > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > >> thoughts
> > >> > are
> > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> > >> > > >Peer
> > >> > Point
> > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> > >> > > >consulting
> > >> and
> > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > >> Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> > >> > > >combined
> > >> > with
> > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> > >> > > >Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >________________________________
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> > >> > > >is
> > >> > addressed.
> > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author
> > >> > > >and
> > >> > do
> > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you
> > >> > > >are not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> > >> > > >Please
> > >> > contact
> > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> error.
> > >> > Shape
> > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -
> -
> > >> ----
> > >> -----
> > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> > >> (including any
> > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> > >> It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> > >> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> > >> are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> > >> the email from your system.
> > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --------------------------------------------------- This email
> (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
> named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and
> should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If
> you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views
> and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those
> of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not
necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
associated companies.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Hari Kannan
2012-11-21 19:42:24 UTC
Permalink
@James: Are you saying there is no benefit in having a single VM having multiple IPs or a single NIC having multiple IPs?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:41 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

But if customer requests it then you need to provide it. May people use IP locking than port locking for SSL certs.

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:37
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I don't actually see the benefit of this. It really goes against the whole point of a Cloud environment. You shouldn't find yourself in a situation where you need multiple IPs per interface.

-- James

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a shared and an isolated network.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:29
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second IP will not work because of anti-spoofing.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> way and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release
> 4.1 if it makes it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
> necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
> anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It
> just seems easier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
> ip's on the same nic.
>
> *Facundo Guerrero*
> *System Administrator*
> *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
> Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
> GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
> fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
> *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
> >
> > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> > IPs per NIC.
> >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
> VM
> > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> > >>
> > >> Matthew Hartmann
> > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> > >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> > >>
> > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> > >> http://www.tls.net
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan Bastin
> > >> 07739668262
> > >>
> > >> ----- Reply message -----
> > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> > >>
> > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> > >>
> > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Anthony
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> > >> > [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> >
> > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > >> Hope
> > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Jayapal
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >This gets my vote
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Regards
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Geoff
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> > >> > > >get
> > >> this
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >happen.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
> only
> > >> made
> > >> > nat
> > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> > >> > > >the
> > >> vm
> > >> > as
> > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Jira link >
> > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
> can
> > >> vote
> > >> > on it.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Jonathan
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> > >> > > >> for
> > >> > this.
> > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> > >> > > >> open IP
> > >> > on
> > >> > > >> the same
> > >> > > >VM.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > >> advanced
> > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network.
> > >> > > >> > What I
> > >> want
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >> > know
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> > >> > > >> > using
> > >> an
> > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
> assign
> > >> > > >> > say
> > >> 5
> > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> -
> -
> > >> > > >> ----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >> -
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> > >> > > >> > for
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > >> > privileged
> > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > >> > > >> > used
> > >> by
> > >> > any
> > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > >> contact
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
> author's
> > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > >> > > >> > and
> > >> not
> > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> > > >> > Internet
> > >> > Ltd
> > >> > > >> > or associated
> > >> > > >companies.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >-
> -
> > >> > > >----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >---
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > >> > (including
> > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above.
> > >> > It
> > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and
> > >> > > >should not
> > >> be
> > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> email
> > >> from
> > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > >> thoughts
> > >> > are
> > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> > >> > > >Peer
> > >> > Point
> > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> > >> > > >consulting
> > >> and
> > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > >> Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> > >> > > >combined
> > >> > with
> > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> > >> > > >Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >________________________________
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> > >> > > >is
> > >> > addressed.
> > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author
> > >> > > >and
> > >> > do
> > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you
> > >> > > >are not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> > >> > > >Please
> > >> > contact
> > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> error.
> > >> > Shape
> > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -
> -
> > >> ----
> > >> -----
> > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> > >> (including any
> > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> > >> It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> > >> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> > >> are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> > >> the email from your system.
> > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --------------------------------------------------- This email
> (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
> named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and
> should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If
> you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views
> and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those
> of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Boylan, James
2012-11-21 19:46:12 UTC
Permalink
Single NIC. I can definitely seeing situations where you would want to have multiple interfaces for managing the traffic within a VM. But I don't really see the real benefit in a cloud environment for having a number of IPs assigned to one NIC. (Cloud environment not just a virtual environment.)

-- James


-----Original Message-----
From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:42 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

@James: Are you saying there is no benefit in having a single VM having multiple IPs or a single NIC having multiple IPs?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:41 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

But if customer requests it then you need to provide it. May people use IP locking than port locking for SSL certs.

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:37
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I don't actually see the benefit of this. It really goes against the whole point of a Cloud environment. You shouldn't find yourself in a situation where you need multiple IPs per interface.

-- James

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a shared and an isolated network.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:29
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second IP will not work because of anti-spoofing.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> way and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release
> 4.1 if it makes it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
> necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
> anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It
> just seems easier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
> ip's on the same nic.
>
> *Facundo Guerrero*
> *System Administrator*
> *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
> Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
> GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
> fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
> *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
> >
> > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> > IPs per NIC.
> >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
> VM
> > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> > >>
> > >> Matthew Hartmann
> > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> > >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> > >>
> > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> > >> http://www.tls.net
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan Bastin
> > >> 07739668262
> > >>
> > >> ----- Reply message -----
> > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> > >>
> > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> > >>
> > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Anthony
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> > >> > [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> >
> > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > >> Hope
> > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Jayapal
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >This gets my vote
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Regards
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Geoff
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> > >> > > >get
> > >> this
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >happen.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
> only
> > >> made
> > >> > nat
> > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> > >> > > >the
> > >> vm
> > >> > as
> > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Jira link >
> > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
> can
> > >> vote
> > >> > on it.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Jonathan
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> > >> > > >> for
> > >> > this.
> > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> > >> > > >> open IP
> > >> > on
> > >> > > >> the same
> > >> > > >VM.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > >> advanced
> > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network.
> > >> > > >> > What I
> > >> want
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >> > know
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> > >> > > >> > using
> > >> an
> > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
> assign
> > >> > > >> > say
> > >> 5
> > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> -
> -
> > >> > > >> ----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >> -
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> > >> > > >> > for
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > >> > privileged
> > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > >> > > >> > used
> > >> by
> > >> > any
> > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > >> contact
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
> author's
> > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > >> > > >> > and
> > >> not
> > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> > > >> > Internet
> > >> > Ltd
> > >> > > >> > or associated
> > >> > > >companies.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >-
> -
> > >> > > >----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >---
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > >> > (including
> > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above.
> > >> > It
> > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and
> > >> > > >should not
> > >> be
> > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> email
> > >> from
> > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > >> thoughts
> > >> > are
> > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> > >> > > >Peer
> > >> > Point
> > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> > >> > > >consulting
> > >> and
> > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > >> Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> > >> > > >combined
> > >> > with
> > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> > >> > > >Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >________________________________
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> > >> > > >is
> > >> > addressed.
> > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author
> > >> > > >and
> > >> > do
> > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you
> > >> > > >are not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> > >> > > >Please
> > >> > contact
> > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> error.
> > >> > Shape
> > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -
> -
> > >> ----
> > >> -----
> > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> > >> (including any
> > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> > >> It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> > >> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> > >> are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> > >> the email from your system.
> > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --------------------------------------------------- This email
> (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
> named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and
> should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If
> you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views
> and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those
> of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Hari Kannan
2012-11-21 20:05:18 UTC
Permalink
It is an interesting topic - as I see it, there seem to be some hypervisors/OS limitations (on virtual environments) that, while allowing multiple nics per VM, limit the number - so, by extending in 2 dimensions (multiple nics per vm and multiple ips per nics), you can extend the number of IPs per VM - for that reason, I can see the benefit. Another reason, could be that AWS supports both, so stay compatible and competitive, we may need to consider it. Plus, there may be technical challenges in implementing multiple nics in a Basic network zone (this I'm not sure, esp if it is even possible to have multiple IPs per nic on basic zone)..

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:46 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Single NIC. I can definitely seeing situations where you would want to have multiple interfaces for managing the traffic within a VM. But I don't really see the real benefit in a cloud environment for having a number of IPs assigned to one NIC. (Cloud environment not just a virtual environment.)

-- James


-----Original Message-----
From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:42 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

@James: Are you saying there is no benefit in having a single VM having multiple IPs or a single NIC having multiple IPs?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:41 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

But if customer requests it then you need to provide it. May people use IP locking than port locking for SSL certs.

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:37
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I don't actually see the benefit of this. It really goes against the whole point of a Cloud environment. You shouldn't find yourself in a situation where you need multiple IPs per interface.

-- James

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a shared and an isolated network.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:29
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second IP will not work because of anti-spoofing.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> way and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release
> 4.1 if it makes it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
> necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
> anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It
> just seems easier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
> ip's on the same nic.
>
> *Facundo Guerrero*
> *System Administrator*
> *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
> Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
> GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
> fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
> *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
> >
> > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> > IPs per NIC.
> >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
> VM
> > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> > >>
> > >> Matthew Hartmann
> > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> > >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> > >>
> > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> > >> http://www.tls.net
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan Bastin
> > >> 07739668262
> > >>
> > >> ----- Reply message -----
> > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> > >>
> > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> > >>
> > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Anthony
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> > >> > [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> >
> > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > >> Hope
> > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Jayapal
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >This gets my vote
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Regards
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Geoff
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> > >> > > >get
> > >> this
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >happen.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
> only
> > >> made
> > >> > nat
> > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> > >> > > >the
> > >> vm
> > >> > as
> > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Jira link >
> > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
> can
> > >> vote
> > >> > on it.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Jonathan
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> > >> > > >> for
> > >> > this.
> > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> > >> > > >> open IP
> > >> > on
> > >> > > >> the same
> > >> > > >VM.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > >> advanced
> > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network.
> > >> > > >> > What I
> > >> want
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >> > know
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> > >> > > >> > using
> > >> an
> > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
> assign
> > >> > > >> > say
> > >> 5
> > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> -
> -
> > >> > > >> ----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >> -
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> > >> > > >> > for
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > >> > privileged
> > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > >> > > >> > used
> > >> by
> > >> > any
> > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > >> contact
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
> author's
> > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > >> > > >> > and
> > >> not
> > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> > > >> > Internet
> > >> > Ltd
> > >> > > >> > or associated
> > >> > > >companies.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >-
> -
> > >> > > >----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >---
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > >> > (including
> > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above.
> > >> > It
> > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and
> > >> > > >should not
> > >> be
> > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> email
> > >> from
> > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > >> thoughts
> > >> > are
> > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> > >> > > >Peer
> > >> > Point
> > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> > >> > > >consulting
> > >> and
> > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > >> Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> > >> > > >combined
> > >> > with
> > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> > >> > > >Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >________________________________
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> > >> > > >is
> > >> > addressed.
> > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author
> > >> > > >and
> > >> > do
> > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you
> > >> > > >are not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> > >> > > >Please
> > >> > contact
> > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> error.
> > >> > Shape
> > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -
> -
> > >> ----
> > >> -----
> > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> > >> (including any
> > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> > >> It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> > >> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> > >> are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> > >> the email from your system.
> > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --------------------------------------------------- This email
> (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
> named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and
> should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If
> you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views
> and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those
> of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Jonathan Bastin
2012-11-21 20:07:35 UTC
Permalink
Personally for immediate requirements multiple IP's per nic would surfice
but also multiple nics to different networks as well could be a request.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 20:05
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

It is an interesting topic - as I see it, there seem to be some
hypervisors/OS limitations (on virtual environments) that, while allowing
multiple nics per VM, limit the number - so, by extending in 2 dimensions
(multiple nics per vm and multiple ips per nics), you can extend the number
of IPs per VM - for that reason, I can see the benefit. Another reason,
could be that AWS supports both, so stay compatible and competitive, we may
need to consider it. Plus, there may be technical challenges in implementing
multiple nics in a Basic network zone (this I'm not sure, esp if it is even
possible to have multiple IPs per nic on basic zone)..

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:46 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Single NIC. I can definitely seeing situations where you would want to have
multiple interfaces for managing the traffic within a VM. But I don't really
see the real benefit in a cloud environment for having a number of IPs
assigned to one NIC. (Cloud environment not just a virtual environment.)

-- James


-----Original Message-----
From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:42 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

@James: Are you saying there is no benefit in having a single VM having
multiple IPs or a single NIC having multiple IPs?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:41 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

But if customer requests it then you need to provide it. May people use IP
locking than port locking for SSL certs.

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:37
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I don't actually see the benefit of this. It really goes against the whole
point of a Cloud environment. You shouldn't find yourself in a situation
where you need multiple IPs per interface.

-- James

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest
network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a shared and
an isolated network.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:29
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If
that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second IP
will not work because of anti-spoofing.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> way and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release
> 4.1 if it makes it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
> necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
> anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It
> just seems easier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
> ip's on the same nic.
>
> *Facundo Guerrero*
> *System Administrator*
> *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
> Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
> GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
> fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
> *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
> >
> > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> > IPs per NIC.
> >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
> VM
> > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> > >>
> > >> Matthew Hartmann
> > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> > >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> > >>
> > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> > >> http://www.tls.net
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan Bastin
> > >> 07739668262
> > >>
> > >> ----- Reply message -----
> > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> > >>
> > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> > >>
> > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Anthony
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> > >> > [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> >
> > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > >> Hope
> > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Jayapal
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >This gets my vote
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Regards
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Geoff
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> > >> > > >get
> > >> this
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >happen.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
> only
> > >> made
> > >> > nat
> > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> > >> > > >the
> > >> vm
> > >> > as
> > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Jira link >
> > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
> can
> > >> vote
> > >> > on it.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Jonathan
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> > >> > > >> for
> > >> > this.
> > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> > >> > > >> open IP
> > >> > on
> > >> > > >> the same
> > >> > > >VM.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > >> advanced
> > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network.
> > >> > > >> > What I
> > >> want
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >> > know
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> > >> > > >> > using
> > >> an
> > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
> assign
> > >> > > >> > say
> > >> 5
> > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> -
> -
> > >> > > >> ----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >> -
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> > >> > > >> > for
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > >> > privileged
> > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > >> > > >> > used
> > >> by
> > >> > any
> > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > >> contact
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
> author's
> > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > >> > > >> > and
> > >> not
> > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> > > >> > Internet
> > >> > Ltd
> > >> > > >> > or associated
> > >> > > >companies.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >-
> -
> > >> > > >----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >---
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > >> > (including
> > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above.
> > >> > It
> > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and
> > >> > > >should not
> > >> be
> > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> email
> > >> from
> > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > >> thoughts
> > >> > are
> > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> > >> > > >Peer
> > >> > Point
> > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> > >> > > >consulting
> > >> and
> > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > >> Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> > >> > > >combined
> > >> > with
> > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> > >> > > >Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >________________________________
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> > >> > > >is
> > >> > addressed.
> > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author
> > >> > > >and
> > >> > do
> > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you
> > >> > > >are not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> > >> > > >Please
> > >> > contact
> > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> error.
> > >> > Shape
> > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -
> -
> > >> ----
> > >> -----
> > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> > >> (including any
> > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> > >> It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> > >> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> > >> are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> > >> the email from your system.
> > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --------------------------------------------------- This email
> (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
> named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and
> should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If
> you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views
> and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those
> of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not
necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
associated companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not
necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
associated companies.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Facundo Guerrero
2012-11-21 20:45:43 UTC
Permalink
The multiples IP's for nic's it's also a great feature to use heartbeat in
the vms .

*Facundo Guerrero*
*System Administrator*
*IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
*www.ipaddress.com.ar*




2012/11/21 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>

> Personally for immediate requirements multiple IP's per nic would surfice
> but also multiple nics to different networks as well could be a request.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 20:05
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> It is an interesting topic - as I see it, there seem to be some
> hypervisors/OS limitations (on virtual environments) that, while allowing
> multiple nics per VM, limit the number - so, by extending in 2 dimensions
> (multiple nics per vm and multiple ips per nics), you can extend the number
> of IPs per VM - for that reason, I can see the benefit. Another reason,
> could be that AWS supports both, so stay compatible and competitive, we may
> need to consider it. Plus, there may be technical challenges in
> implementing
> multiple nics in a Basic network zone (this I'm not sure, esp if it is even
> possible to have multiple IPs per nic on basic zone)..
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:46 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Single NIC. I can definitely seeing situations where you would want to have
> multiple interfaces for managing the traffic within a VM. But I don't
> really
> see the real benefit in a cloud environment for having a number of IPs
> assigned to one NIC. (Cloud environment not just a virtual environment.)
>
> -- James
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:42 PM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> @James: Are you saying there is no benefit in having a single VM having
> multiple IPs or a single NIC having multiple IPs?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:41 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> But if customer requests it then you need to provide it. May people use IP
> locking than port locking for SSL certs.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 19:37
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I don't actually see the benefit of this. It really goes against the whole
> point of a Cloud environment. You shouldn't find yourself in a situation
> where you need multiple IPs per interface.
>
> -- James
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest
> network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a shared and
> an isolated network.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 19:29
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If
> that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second
> IP
> will not work because of anti-spoofing.
>
> Anthony
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> > I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> > way and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release
> > 4.1 if it makes it.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
> > To: cloudstack-users
> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> > Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
> > necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
> > anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It
> > just seems easier
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
> > To: cloudstack-users
> > Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> >
> > KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
> > ip's on the same nic.
> >
> > *Facundo Guerrero*
> > *System Administrator*
> > *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
> > Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
> > GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
> > fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
> > *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> > > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
> > >
> > > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> > > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> > > IPs per NIC.
> > >
> > > > Anthony
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > > >>
> > > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
> > VM
> > > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> > > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> > > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> > > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> > > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> > > >>
> > > >> Matthew Hartmann
> > > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> > > >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> > > >>
> > > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> > > >> http://www.tls.net
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> > > >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > > >>
> > > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Jonathan Bastin
> > > >> 07739668262
> > > >>
> > > >> ----- Reply message -----
> > > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > > >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > > >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> > > >>
> > > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> > > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> > > >>
> > > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Anthony
> > > >>
> > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> > > >> > [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > > >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > > >> Hope
> > > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > Jayapal
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > > >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >This gets my vote
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >Regards
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >Geoff
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> > > >> > > >get
> > > >> this
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > >happen.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
> > only
> > > >> made
> > > >> > nat
> > > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> > > >> > > >the
> > > >> vm
> > > >> > as
> > > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >Jira link >
> > > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
> > can
> > > >> vote
> > > >> > on it.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Jonathan
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> > > >> > > >> for
> > > >> > this.
> > > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> > > >> > > >> open IP
> > > >> > on
> > > >> > > >> the same
> > > >> > > >VM.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > > >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > > >> advanced
> > > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network.
> > > >> > > >> > What I
> > > >> want
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > >> > know
> > > >> > > >> is
> > > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> > > >> > > >> > using
> > > >> an
> > > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
> > assign
> > > >> > > >> > say
> > > >> 5
> > > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > >> -
> > -
> > > >> > > >> ----
> > > >> --
> > > >> > ---
> > > >> > > >> -
> > > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> > > >> > > >> > for
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > > >> > privileged
> > > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > > >> > > >> > used
> > > >> by
> > > >> > any
> > > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > > >> contact
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
> > author's
> > > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > > >> > > >> > and
> > > >> not
> > > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > > >> > > >> > Internet
> > > >> > Ltd
> > > >> > > >> > or associated
> > > >> > > >companies.
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > >-
> > -
> > > >> > > >----
> > > >> --
> > > >> > ---
> > > >> > > >---
> > > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > > >> > (including
> > > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> > above.
> > > >> > It
> > > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and
> > > >> > > >should not
> > > >> be
> > > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> > are
> > > >> > > >not
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> > email
> > > >> from
> > > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > > >> thoughts
> > > >> > are
> > > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> > > >> > > >Peer
> > > >> > Point
> > > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> > > >> > > >consulting
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > > >> Enterprises
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> > > >> > > >combined
> > > >> > with
> > > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> > > >> > > >Enterprises
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >________________________________
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> > > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> > > >> > > >is
> > > >> > addressed.
> > > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> > author
> > > >> > > >and
> > > >> > do
> > > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you
> > > >> > > >are not
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> > > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> > > >> > > >Please
> > > >> > contact
> > > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> > error.
> > > >> > Shape
> > > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >>
> > > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> -
> > -
> > > >> ----
> > > >> -----
> > > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> > > >> (including any
> > > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> > > >> It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> > > >> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> > > >> are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> > > >> the email from your system.
> > > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > --------------------------------------------------- This email
> > (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
> > named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and
> > should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If
> > you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> > the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views
> > and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those
> > of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
> contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
> copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
> recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and
> not
> necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
> associated companies.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
> contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
> copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
> recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and
> not
> necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
> associated companies.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the
> recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged
> information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other
> person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and
> delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions,
> views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of
> those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
>
Jonathan Bastin
2012-11-21 20:06:02 UTC
Permalink
I can think of a few. Also some people stay with what they know.

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:46
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Single NIC. I can definitely seeing situations where you would want to have
multiple interfaces for managing the traffic within a VM. But I don't really
see the real benefit in a cloud environment for having a number of IPs
assigned to one NIC. (Cloud environment not just a virtual environment.)

-- James


-----Original Message-----
From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:42 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

@James: Are you saying there is no benefit in having a single VM having
multiple IPs or a single NIC having multiple IPs?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:41 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

But if customer requests it then you need to provide it. May people use IP
locking than port locking for SSL certs.

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:37
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I don't actually see the benefit of this. It really goes against the whole
point of a Cloud environment. You shouldn't find yourself in a situation
where you need multiple IPs per interface.

-- James

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest
network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a shared and
an isolated network.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:29
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If
that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second IP
will not work because of anti-spoofing.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> way and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release
> 4.1 if it makes it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
> necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
> anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It
> just seems easier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
> ip's on the same nic.
>
> *Facundo Guerrero*
> *System Administrator*
> *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
> Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
> GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
> fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
> *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
> >
> > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> > IPs per NIC.
> >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
> VM
> > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> > >>
> > >> Matthew Hartmann
> > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> > >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> > >>
> > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> > >> http://www.tls.net
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan Bastin
> > >> 07739668262
> > >>
> > >> ----- Reply message -----
> > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> > >>
> > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> > >>
> > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Anthony
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> > >> > [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> >
> > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > >> Hope
> > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Jayapal
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >This gets my vote
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Regards
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Geoff
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> > >> > > >get
> > >> this
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >happen.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
> only
> > >> made
> > >> > nat
> > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> > >> > > >the
> > >> vm
> > >> > as
> > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Jira link >
> > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
> can
> > >> vote
> > >> > on it.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Jonathan
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> > >> > > >> for
> > >> > this.
> > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> > >> > > >> open IP
> > >> > on
> > >> > > >> the same
> > >> > > >VM.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > >> advanced
> > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network.
> > >> > > >> > What I
> > >> want
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >> > know
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> > >> > > >> > using
> > >> an
> > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
> assign
> > >> > > >> > say
> > >> 5
> > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> -
> -
> > >> > > >> ----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >> -
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> > >> > > >> > for
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > >> > privileged
> > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > >> > > >> > used
> > >> by
> > >> > any
> > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > >> contact
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
> author's
> > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > >> > > >> > and
> > >> not
> > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> > > >> > Internet
> > >> > Ltd
> > >> > > >> > or associated
> > >> > > >companies.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >-
> -
> > >> > > >----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >---
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > >> > (including
> > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above.
> > >> > It
> > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and
> > >> > > >should not
> > >> be
> > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> email
> > >> from
> > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > >> thoughts
> > >> > are
> > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> > >> > > >Peer
> > >> > Point
> > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> > >> > > >consulting
> > >> and
> > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > >> Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> > >> > > >combined
> > >> > with
> > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> > >> > > >Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >________________________________
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> > >> > > >is
> > >> > addressed.
> > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author
> > >> > > >and
> > >> > do
> > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you
> > >> > > >are not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> > >> > > >Please
> > >> > contact
> > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> error.
> > >> > Shape
> > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -
> -
> > >> ----
> > >> -----
> > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> > >> (including any
> > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> > >> It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> > >> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> > >> are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> > >> the email from your system.
> > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --------------------------------------------------- This email
> (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
> named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and
> should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If
> you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views
> and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those
> of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not
necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
associated companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not
necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
associated companies.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Clayton Weise
2012-11-21 22:26:06 UTC
Permalink
James, you're looking at it from a larger scope in which VMs are cogs in a big machine, but if you look at it from a smaller customer perspective this is not only something that is essential, it's _assumed_ to exist. Case in point, shared hosting providers of any sort. It's very common to have a single server which hosts multiple websites and SSL requires a unique binding. There are NAT hacks around this with advanced networking, but nothing in basic networking.

For smaller cloud hosting companies, web design firms and other hosting providers are easy customers to acquire and see a big benefit in handing off the infrastructure to the cloud hoster and just worrying about administering their websites. A VM that can only have a single IP address is basically useless for them. And if you tell them they need to get separate instances for each SSL site they're going to go to a competitor.

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:46 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Single NIC. I can definitely seeing situations where you would want to have multiple interfaces for managing the traffic within a VM. But I don't really see the real benefit in a cloud environment for having a number of IPs assigned to one NIC. (Cloud environment not just a virtual environment.)

-- James


-----Original Message-----
From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:42 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

@James: Are you saying there is no benefit in having a single VM having multiple IPs or a single NIC having multiple IPs?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:41 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

But if customer requests it then you need to provide it. May people use IP locking than port locking for SSL certs.

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:37
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I don't actually see the benefit of this. It really goes against the whole point of a Cloud environment. You shouldn't find yourself in a situation where you need multiple IPs per interface.

-- James

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a shared and an isolated network.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 21 November 2012 19:29
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second IP will not work because of anti-spoofing.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> way and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release
> 4.1 if it makes it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
> necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
> anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It
> just seems easier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
> ip's on the same nic.
>
> *Facundo Guerrero*
> *System Administrator*
> *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
> Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
> GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
> fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
> *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
> >
> > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> > IPs per NIC.
> >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
> VM
> > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> > >>
> > >> Matthew Hartmann
> > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> > >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> > >>
> > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> > >> http://www.tls.net
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan Bastin
> > >> 07739668262
> > >>
> > >> ----- Reply message -----
> > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> > >>
> > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> > >>
> > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Anthony
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> > >> > [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> >
> > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > >> Hope
> > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Jayapal
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >This gets my vote
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Regards
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Geoff
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> > >> > > >get
> > >> this
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >happen.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
> only
> > >> made
> > >> > nat
> > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> > >> > > >the
> > >> vm
> > >> > as
> > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Jira link >
> > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
> can
> > >> vote
> > >> > on it.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Jonathan
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> > >> > > >> for
> > >> > this.
> > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> > >> > > >> open IP
> > >> > on
> > >> > > >> the same
> > >> > > >VM.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > >> advanced
> > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network.
> > >> > > >> > What I
> > >> want
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >> > know
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> > >> > > >> > using
> > >> an
> > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
> assign
> > >> > > >> > say
> > >> 5
> > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> -
> -
> > >> > > >> ----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >> -
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> > >> > > >> > for
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > >> > privileged
> > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > >> > > >> > used
> > >> by
> > >> > any
> > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > >> contact
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
> author's
> > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > >> > > >> > and
> > >> not
> > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> > > >> > Internet
> > >> > Ltd
> > >> > > >> > or associated
> > >> > > >companies.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >-
> -
> > >> > > >----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >---
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > >> > (including
> > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above.
> > >> > It
> > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and
> > >> > > >should not
> > >> be
> > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> email
> > >> from
> > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > >> thoughts
> > >> > are
> > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> > >> > > >Peer
> > >> > Point
> > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> > >> > > >consulting
> > >> and
> > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > >> Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> > >> > > >combined
> > >> > with
> > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> > >> > > >Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >________________________________
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> > >> > > >is
> > >> > addressed.
> > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author
> > >> > > >and
> > >> > do
> > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you
> > >> > > >are not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> > >> > > >Please
> > >> > contact
> > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> error.
> > >> > Shape
> > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -
> -
> > >> ----
> > >> -----
> > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> > >> (including any
> > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
> > >> It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> > >> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> > >> are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> > >> the email from your system.
> > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --------------------------------------------------- This email
> (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
> named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and
> should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If
> you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
> the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views
> and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those
> of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Chiradeep Vittal
2012-11-21 23:56:37 UTC
Permalink
To summarise the discussion so far:
- multiple guest Ips per NIC is very important for VPS-like environments.
The primary usecase here would be ssl certs that are tied to the ip.
- an additional advantage is the ability to perform ip-takeover required
in HA/hearbeat environments
- most important in a shared network (e.g., where all vms have
non-RFC1918 addresses)
- also required in advanced zone where there is a virtual router doing
NAT/PF.
- it is expected that there is a 'primary ip' assigned by DHCP and the
additional ips are assigned manually by the VM owner. However additional
ips are requested through CS API/UI.
- should be able to NAT to these additional guest ips when there is a
VR/managed firewall.
- In Basic Zone this is a nice to have but not pressing.

On 11/21/12 2:26 PM, "Clayton Weise" <***@iswest.net> wrote:

>James, you're looking at it from a larger scope in which VMs are cogs in
>a big machine, but if you look at it from a smaller customer perspective
>this is not only something that is essential, it's _assumed_ to exist.
>Case in point, shared hosting providers of any sort. It's very common to
>have a single server which hosts multiple websites and SSL requires a
>unique binding. There are NAT hacks around this with advanced
>networking, but nothing in basic networking.
>
>For smaller cloud hosting companies, web design firms and other hosting
>providers are easy customers to acquire and see a big benefit in handing
>off the infrastructure to the cloud hoster and just worrying about
>administering their websites. A VM that can only have a single IP
>address is basically useless for them. And if you tell them they need to
>get separate instances for each SSL site they're going to go to a
>competitor.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Boylan, James [mailto:***@orbitz.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:46 AM
>To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
>Single NIC. I can definitely seeing situations where you would want to
>have multiple interfaces for managing the traffic within a VM. But I
>don't really see the real benefit in a cloud environment for having a
>number of IPs assigned to one NIC. (Cloud environment not just a virtual
>environment.)
>
>-- James
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Hari Kannan [mailto:***@citrix.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:42 PM
>To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
>@James: Are you saying there is no benefit in having a single VM having
>multiple IPs or a single NIC having multiple IPs?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:***@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:41 AM
>To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
>But if customer requests it then you need to provide it. May people use
>IP locking than port locking for SSL certs.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Boylan, James [mailto:***@orbitz.com]
>Sent: 21 November 2012 19:37
>To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
>I don't actually see the benefit of this. It really goes against the
>whole point of a Cloud environment. You shouldn't find yourself in a
>situation where you need multiple IPs per interface.
>
>-- James
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:***@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM
>To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
>I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the
>guest network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a
>shared and an isolated network.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Anthony Xu [mailto:***@citrix.com]
>Sent: 21 November 2012 19:29
>To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
>Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone?
>If that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the
>second IP will not work because of anti-spoofing.
>
>Anthony
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:***@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
>> To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>>
>> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
>> way and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release
>> 4.1 if it makes it.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:***@iswest.net]
>> Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
>> To: cloudstack-users
>> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>>
>> Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
>> necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
>> anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It
>> just seems easier
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:***@ipaddress.com.ar]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
>> To: cloudstack-users
>> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>>
>> KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
>> ip's on the same nic.
>>
>> *Facundo Guerrero*
>> *System Administrator*
>> *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
>> Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
>> GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
>> ***@ipaddress.com.ar
>> *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <***@sungard.com>
>>
>> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <***@citrix.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
>> > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
>> > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
>> >
>> > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
>> > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
>> > IPs per NIC.
>> >
>> > > Anthony
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:***@tls.net]
>> > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
>> > >> To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>> > >>
>> > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
>> VM
>> > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
>> > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
>> > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
>> > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
>> > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
>> > >>
>> > >> Matthew Hartmann
>> > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
>> > >> ***@tls.net
>> > >>
>> > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
>> > >> http://www.tls.net
>> > >>
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
>> > >> [mailto:***@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
>> > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
>> > >> To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>> > >>
>> > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards,
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Jonathan Bastin
>> > >> 07739668262
>> > >>
>> > >> ----- Reply message -----
>> > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <***@citrix.com>
>> > >> To: "cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org"
>> > >> <cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org>
>> > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
>> > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
>> > >>
>> > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
>> > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
>> > >>
>> > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Anthony
>> > >>
>> > >> > -----Original Message-----
>> > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
>> > >> > [mailto:***@citrix.com]
>> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
>> > >> > To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
>> > >> Hope
>> > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thanks,
>> > >> > Jayapal
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
>> > >> > > <***@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > >This gets my vote
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >Regards
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >Geoff
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
>> > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
>> > >> > [mailto:***@peerpointinternet.co.uk]
>> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
>> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
>> > >> > > >get
>> > >> this
>> > >> > to
>> > >> > > >happen.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
>> > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:***@ipaddress.com.ar]
>> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
>> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
>> > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
>> only
>> > >> made
>> > >> > nat
>> > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
>> > >> > > >the
>> > >> vm
>> > >> > as
>> > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >Jira link >
>> > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <***@iswest.net>
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
>> can
>> > >> vote
>> > >> > on it.
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:***@ipaddress.com.ar]
>> > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
>> > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-***@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> Jonathan
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
>> > >> > > >> for
>> > >> > this.
>> > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
>> > >> > > >> open IP
>> > >> > on
>> > >> > > >> the same
>> > >> > > >VM.
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
>> > >> > <***@peerpointinternet.co.uk>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
>> > >> advanced
>> > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network.
>> > >> > > >> > What I
>> > >> want
>> > >> > to
>> > >> > > >> > know
>> > >> > > >> is
>> > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
>> > >> > > >> > using
>> > >> an
>> > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
>> assign
>> > >> > > >> > say
>> > >> 5
>> > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > > >> -
>> -
>> > >> > > >> ----
>> > >> --
>> > >> > ---
>> > >> > > >> -
>> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
>> > >> > > >> > for
>> > >> the
>> > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
>> > >> > privileged
>> > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
>> > >> > > >> > used
>> > >> by
>> > >> > any
>> > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
>> > >> contact
>> > >> > the
>> > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
>> author's
>> > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
>> > >> > > >> > and
>> > >> not
>> > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
>> > >> > > >> > Internet
>> > >> > Ltd
>> > >> > > >> > or associated
>> > >> > > >companies.
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > > >-
>> -
>> > >> > > >----
>> > >> --
>> > >> > ---
>> > >> > > >---
>> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
>> > >> > (including
>> > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
>> above.
>> > >> > It
>> > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and
>> > >> > > >should not
>> > >> be
>> > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
>> are
>> > >> > > >not
>> > >> > the
>> > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
>> email
>> > >> from
>> > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
>> > >> thoughts
>> > >> > are
>> > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
>> > >> > > >Peer
>> > >> > Point
>> > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
>> > >> > > >consulting
>> > >> and
>> > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
>> > >> Enterprises
>> > >> > to
>> > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
>> > >> > > >combined
>> > >> > with
>> > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
>> > >> > > >Enterprises
>> > >> > to
>> > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >________________________________
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
>> > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
>> > >> > > >is
>> > >> > addressed.
>> > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
>> author
>> > >> > > >and
>> > >> > do
>> > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you
>> > >> > > >are not
>> > >> > the
>> > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
>> > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
>> > >> > > >Please
>> > >> > contact
>> > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
>> error.
>> > >> > Shape
>> > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> -
>> -
>> > >> ----
>> > >> -----
>> > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
>> > >> (including any
>> > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
>> > >> It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
>> > >> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
>> > >> are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
>> > >> the email from your system.
>> > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
>> > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
>> > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>> --------------------------------------------------- This email
>> (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
>> named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and
>> should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If
>> you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete
>> the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views
>> and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those
>> of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--
>---------------------------------------------- This email (including any
>attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
>contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read,
>copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named
>recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system.
>The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and
>not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or
>associated companies.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>------------------------------------------------ This email (including
>any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It
>may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be
>read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the
>named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your
>system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
>own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
>Intern
David Nalley
2012-11-22 00:12:49 UTC
Permalink
> - it is expected that there is a 'primary ip' assigned by DHCP and the
> additional ips are assigned manually by the VM owner. However additional
> ips are requested through CS API/UI.

I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding
additional interfaces. I'd almost argue for requiring number of
interfaces/IPs to be set at machine instantiation and still handing
out addresses to all interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle
that cleanly.
Boylan, James
2012-11-22 01:50:38 UTC
Permalink
I also argue that what they are asking for really is in conflict of the purpose of a cloud environment. If you are merely after a virtualized environment you can use vsphere, kvm with virt-manager or xenserver. Multiple IPs per nic do nothing to improve the performance or the functionality of a cloud environment.

Going down the road of adding features like that would be taking valuable development time away from tasks and features that actually benefit a cloud architecture. While I do understand their issue, there are other ways of implementing what they are listing as reasons that is cloud architecture friendly. (using NAT and isolated private networks for one)

-- James

----- Original Message -----
From: David Nalley [mailto:david-m+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 06:12 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdWLn643/***@public.gmane.orge.org>
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

> - it is expected that there is a 'primary ip' assigned by DHCP and the
> additional ips are assigned manually by the VM owner. However additional
> ips are requested through CS API/UI.

I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding
additional interfaces. I'd almost argue for requiring number of
interfaces/IPs to be set at machine instantiation and still handing
out addresses to all interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle
that cleanly.
Clayton Weise
2012-11-22 02:41:06 UTC
Permalink
> I also argue that what they are asking for really is in conflict of the purpose of a cloud environment.

I think this depends on the scope of who the cloud owner is. If the owner is a single organization then yes, I would agree. However if the owner is a service provider, than I would disagree. I know there are larger things on the table for the ACS crew, so I'm not going to try and make a judgment call here as to how they should prioritize because that's really more up to the community at large and what kind of feedback they get from their paying clients (CloudPlatform) as well. And that's not something I think either of us have the data to make a decision on.

That being said, I don't know what kind of work is involved in adding a feature like this, and how much it would actually detract from the future development of ACS. I know it's something that has come up in IRC on more than a few occasions and it's not the first time we've seen it on the mailing list either. I would also encourage anybody involved in the community with the skills required to work out a tech spec on this and put something more formal together. I think part of the issue has been the fact (as we've seen) that there isn't a solid consensus on how to even accomplish this, let alone the specific mechanics of how it will work.

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 5:51 PM
To: 'cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org'
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

I also argue that what they are asking for really is in conflict of the purpose of a cloud environment. If you are merely after a virtualized environment you can use vsphere, kvm with virt-manager or xenserver. Multiple IPs per nic do nothing to improve the performance or the functionality of a cloud environment.

Going down the road of adding features like that would be taking valuable development time away from tasks and features that actually benefit a cloud architecture. While I do understand their issue, there are other ways of implementing what they are listing as reasons that is cloud architecture friendly. (using NAT and isolated private networks for one)

-- James

----- Original Message -----
From: David Nalley [mailto:david-m+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 06:12 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdWLn643/***@public.gmane.orge.org>
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

> - it is expected that there is a 'primary ip' assigned by DHCP and the
> additional ips are assigned manually by the VM owner. However additional
> ips are requested through CS API/UI.

I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding
additional interfaces. I'd almost argue for requiring number of
interfaces/IPs to be set at machine instantiation and still handing
out addresses to all interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle
that cleanly.
Chiradeep Vittal
2012-11-26 18:41:58 UTC
Permalink
FWIW, it is a oft-requested feature in AWS as well:
http://goo.gl/cC5qY


On 11/21/12 6:41 PM, "Clayton Weise" <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org> wrote:

>> I also argue that what they are asking for really is in conflict of the
>>purpose of a cloud environment.
>
>I think this depends on the scope of who the cloud owner is. If the
>owner is a single organization then yes, I would agree. However if the
>owner is a service provider, than I would disagree. I know there are
>larger things on the table for the ACS crew, so I'm not going to try and
>make a judgment call here as to how they should prioritize because that's
>really more up to the community at large and what kind of feedback they
>get from their paying clients (CloudPlatform) as well. And that's not
>something I think either of us have the data to make a decision on.
>
>That being said, I don't know what kind of work is involved in adding a
>feature like this, and how much it would actually detract from the future
>development of ACS. I know it's something that has come up in IRC on
>more than a few occasions and it's not the first time we've seen it on
>the mailing list either. I would also encourage anybody involved in the
>community with the skills required to work out a tech spec on this and
>put something more formal together. I think part of the issue has been
>the fact (as we've seen) that there isn't a solid consensus on how to
>even accomplish this, let alone the specific mechanics of how it will
>work.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 5:51 PM
>To: 'cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org'
>Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
>I also argue that what they are asking for really is in conflict of the
>purpose of a cloud environment. If you are merely after a virtualized
>environment you can use vsphere, kvm with virt-manager or xenserver.
>Multiple IPs per nic do nothing to improve the performance or the
>functionality of a cloud environment.
>
>Going down the road of adding features like that would be taking valuable
>development time away from tasks and features that actually benefit a
>cloud architecture. While I do understand their issue, there are other
>ways of implementing what they are listing as reasons that is cloud
>architecture friendly. (using NAT and isolated private networks for one)
>
>-- James
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: David Nalley [mailto:david-m+***@public.gmane.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 06:12 PM
>To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
><cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
>Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
>> - it is expected that there is a 'primary ip' assigned by DHCP and the
>> additional ips are assigned manually by the VM owner. However additional
>> ips are requested through CS API/UI.
>
>I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding
>additional interfaces. I'd almost argue for requiring number of
>interfaces/IPs to be set at machine instantiation and still handing
>out addresses to all interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle
>that cleanly.
Kevin Kluge
2012-11-26 18:52:39 UTC
Permalink
Yes, anyone doing hosting will view this as a critical requirement for self-service infrastructure. This is true for SPs like you mention but also a private cloud supporting multiple web sites.

-kevin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 6:41 PM
> To: 'cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org'
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> > I also argue that what they are asking for really is in conflict of the purpose of
> a cloud environment.
>
> I think this depends on the scope of who the cloud owner is. If the owner is a
> single organization then yes, I would agree. However if the owner is a service
> provider, than I would disagree. I know there are larger things on the table for
> the ACS crew, so I'm not going to try and make a judgment call here as to how
> they should prioritize because that's really more up to the community at large
> and what kind of feedback they get from their paying clients (CloudPlatform) as
> well. And that's not something I think either of us have the data to make a
> decision on.
>
> That being said, I don't know what kind of work is involved in adding a feature
> like this, and how much it would actually detract from the future development
> of ACS. I know it's something that has come up in IRC on more than a few
> occasions and it's not the first time we've seen it on the mailing list either. I
> would also encourage anybody involved in the community with the skills
> required to work out a tech spec on this and put something more formal
> together. I think part of the issue has been the fact (as we've seen) that there
> isn't a solid consensus on how to even accomplish this, let alone the specific
> mechanics of how it will work.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 5:51 PM
> To: 'cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org'
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I also argue that what they are asking for really is in conflict of the purpose of a
> cloud environment. If you are merely after a virtualized environment you can
> use vsphere, kvm with virt-manager or xenserver. Multiple IPs per nic do nothing
> to improve the performance or the functionality of a cloud environment.
>
> Going down the road of adding features like that would be taking valuable
> development time away from tasks and features that actually benefit a cloud
> architecture. While I do understand their issue, there are other ways of
> implementing what they are listing as reasons that is cloud architecture friendly.
> (using NAT and isolated private networks for one)
>
> -- James
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Nalley [mailto:david-m+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 06:12 PM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org <cloudstack-
> users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> > - it is expected that there is a 'primary ip' assigned by DHCP and
> > the additional ips are assigned manually by the VM owner. However
> > additional ips are requested through CS API/UI.
>
> I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional interfaces.
> I'd almost argue for requiring number of interfaces/IPs to be set at machine
> instantiation and still handing out addresses to all interfaces via DHCP, but not
> all OSes will handle that cleanly.
Kevin Kluge
2012-11-26 19:02:48 UTC
Permalink
>
> I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional interfaces.
> I'd almost argue for requiring number of interfaces/IPs to be set at machine
> instantiation and still handing out addresses to all interfaces via DHCP, but not
> all OSes will handle that cleanly.

As you probably know CS hands out IPs via DHCP to multiple NICs today, and it is challenging to work reliably since different guest OS's have different behavior with respect to setting/re-setting the default route in DHCP replies. Today CloudStack has some knowledge of guest OS to make this work but we've seen bugs with that where the list of guest OS behavior is not right. Those are fixable. But there are other cases (e.g. boot from ISO, a user changes the DHCP client post-create, or the user upgrades the OS which changes the DHCP client) where I don't think there is a reasonable fix. So I think we need at a minimum an option to disable DHCP reply on NICs that are not the default route. We should even consider a behavior change to make that the only option.

-kevin
Tamas Monos
2012-11-27 10:20:30 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

Also I have tested earlier 3.0.2 and if you create multiple networks for the same account then the VM automatically gets that many IPs and NICs as many network the VM has.
Then you can use static nat if you need to support multiple websites.

Or another solution to this is to have many static nat IPs on the same network and port forward each IPs port 80 and 443 onto a different port on the VM and configure apache to listen on different ports for different virtual hosts.
There is always a workaround.

Regards

Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012
Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000
Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 7057
http://www.veber.co.uk

Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost
Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:Kevin.Kluge-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 26 November 2012 19:03
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

>
> I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional interfaces.
> I'd almost argue for requiring number of interfaces/IPs to be set at
> machine instantiation and still handing out addresses to all
> interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle that cleanly.

As you probably know CS hands out IPs via DHCP to multiple NICs today, and it is challenging to work reliably since different guest OS's have different behavior with respect to setting/re-setting the default route in DHCP replies. Today CloudStack has some knowledge of guest OS to make this work but we've seen bugs with that where the list of guest OS behavior is not right. Those are fixable. But there are other cases (e.g. boot from ISO, a user changes the DHCP client post-create, or the user upgrades the OS which changes the DHCP client) where I don't think there is a reasonable fix. So I think we need at a minimum an option to disable DHCP reply on NICs that are not the default route. We should even consider a behavior change to make that the only option.

-kevin
Boylan, James
2012-11-27 23:17:36 UTC
Permalink
I agree with Tamas. Cloudstack has functionality that would allow implementations using NAT/LoadBalancer configurations that would not require multiple IPs. Plus the NetScaler Service, if it is a true Netscaler implementation, supports loading the certs into it thus removing the multiple IP address requirement.

-- James
________________________________________
From: Tamas Monos [tamasm-MxBu3ZLyRkL10XsdtD+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:20 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Hi,

Also I have tested earlier 3.0.2 and if you create multiple networks for the same account then the VM automatically gets that many IPs and NICs as many network the VM has.
Then you can use static nat if you need to support multiple websites.

Or another solution to this is to have many static nat IPs on the same network and port forward each IPs port 80 and 443 onto a different port on the VM and configure apache to listen on different ports for different virtual hosts.
There is always a workaround.

Regards

Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012
Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000
Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 7057
http://www.veber.co.uk

Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost
Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:Kevin.Kluge-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 26 November 2012 19:03
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

>
> I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional interfaces.
> I'd almost argue for requiring number of interfaces/IPs to be set at
> machine instantiation and still handing out addresses to all
> interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle that cleanly.

As you probably know CS hands out IPs via DHCP to multiple NICs today, and it is challenging to work reliably since different guest OS's have different behavior with respect to setting/re-setting the default route in DHCP replies. Today CloudStack has some knowledge of guest OS to make this work but we've seen bugs with that where the list of guest OS behavior is not right. Those are fixable. But there are other cases (e.g. boot from ISO, a user changes the DHCP client post-create, or the user upgrades the OS which changes the DHCP client) where I don't think there is a reasonable fix. So I think we need at a minimum an option to disable DHCP reply on NICs that are not the default route. We should even consider a behavior change to make that the only option.

-kevin
Hari Kannan
2012-11-28 16:51:13 UTC
Permalink
As a newbie to Apache, I have a dumb procedural question -

I see there are folks who are in favor of implementing this as well as folks who either believe there are workarounds and/or believe there is no NEED for this. However, if someone really wants to implement this, can/must anyone object? I can imagine if the implementation is bad, we can reject it, but are there any other reasons to NOT implement a feature?

PS1: While this feature is an example, I want to under the general process/guideline for future reference

Hari Kannan

-----Original Message-----
From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:18 PM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

I agree with Tamas. Cloudstack has functionality that would allow implementations using NAT/LoadBalancer configurations that would not require multiple IPs. Plus the NetScaler Service, if it is a true Netscaler implementation, supports loading the certs into it thus removing the multiple IP address requirement.

-- James
________________________________________
From: Tamas Monos [tamasm-MxBu3ZLyRkL10XsdtD+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:20 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Hi,

Also I have tested earlier 3.0.2 and if you create multiple networks for the same account then the VM automatically gets that many IPs and NICs as many network the VM has.
Then you can use static nat if you need to support multiple websites.

Or another solution to this is to have many static nat IPs on the same network and port forward each IPs port 80 and 443 onto a different port on the VM and configure apache to listen on different ports for different virtual hosts.
There is always a workaround.

Regards

Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012
Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000
Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 7057
http://www.veber.co.uk

Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:Kevin.Kluge-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 26 November 2012 19:03
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

>
> I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional interfaces.
> I'd almost argue for requiring number of interfaces/IPs to be set at
> machine instantiation and still handing out addresses to all
> interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle that cleanly.

As you probably know CS hands out IPs via DHCP to multiple NICs today, and it is challenging to work reliably since different guest OS's have different behavior with respect to setting/re-setting the default route in DHCP replies. Today CloudStack has some knowledge of guest OS to make this work but we've seen bugs with that where the list of guest OS behavior is not right. Those are fixable. But there are other cases (e.g. boot from ISO, a user changes the DHCP client post-create, or the user upgrades the OS which changes the DHCP client) where I don't think there is a reasonable fix. So I think we need at a minimum an option to disable DHCP reply on NICs that are not the default route. We should even consider a behavior change to make that the only option.

-kevin
Chip Childers
2012-11-28 17:01:54 UTC
Permalink
Great questions!

So first, actual development decisions need to happen on the
cloudstack-dev list, not users (although we love seeing user
discussions about feature requests!).

The way it works on the dev list, is if you (or anyone) wants to
propose building a feature, you would email the specifics of what you
want to add. Generally, changes are agreed to by gathering consensus
on both *what* and *how*. The developer that is building the feature
would then (hopefully) do a design page on the wiki and / or a
functional spec that elaborates on the discussed feature idea.
Getting consensus on that deign / functional spec then means moving
forward to implementation.

The dev list is also the place to get help with figuring out how to
add the feature (both logistically and technically).

Does that help?

-chip

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Hari Kannan <hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> As a newbie to Apache, I have a dumb procedural question -
>
> I see there are folks who are in favor of implementing this as well as folks who either believe there are workarounds and/or believe there is no NEED for this. However, if someone really wants to implement this, can/must anyone object? I can imagine if the implementation is bad, we can reject it, but are there any other reasons to NOT implement a feature?
>
> PS1: While this feature is an example, I want to under the general process/guideline for future reference
>
> Hari Kannan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:18 PM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I agree with Tamas. Cloudstack has functionality that would allow implementations using NAT/LoadBalancer configurations that would not require multiple IPs. Plus the NetScaler Service, if it is a true Netscaler implementation, supports loading the certs into it thus removing the multiple IP address requirement.
>
> -- James
> ________________________________________
> From: Tamas Monos [tamasm-MxBu3ZLyRkL10XsdtD+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:20 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Hi,
>
> Also I have tested earlier 3.0.2 and if you create multiple networks for the same account then the VM automatically gets that many IPs and NICs as many network the VM has.
> Then you can use static nat if you need to support multiple websites.
>
> Or another solution to this is to have many static nat IPs on the same network and port forward each IPs port 80 and 443 onto a different port on the VM and configure apache to listen on different ports for different virtual hosts.
> There is always a workaround.
>
> Regards
>
> Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012
> Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000
> Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 7057
> http://www.veber.co.uk
>
> Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:Kevin.Kluge-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 26 November 2012 19:03
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
>>
>> I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional interfaces.
>> I'd almost argue for requiring number of interfaces/IPs to be set at
>> machine instantiation and still handing out addresses to all
>> interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle that cleanly.
>
> As you probably know CS hands out IPs via DHCP to multiple NICs today, and it is challenging to work reliably since different guest OS's have different behavior with respect to setting/re-setting the default route in DHCP replies. Today CloudStack has some knowledge of guest OS to make this work but we've seen bugs with that where the list of guest OS behavior is not right. Those are fixable. But there are other cases (e.g. boot from ISO, a user changes the DHCP client post-create, or the user upgrades the OS which changes the DHCP client) where I don't think there is a reasonable fix. So I think we need at a minimum an option to disable DHCP reply on NICs that are not the default route. We should even consider a behavior change to make that the only option.
>
> -kevin
>
Hari Kannan
2012-11-28 17:23:52 UTC
Permalink
Thanks, Chip - that helps!!! Another follow-up question, though..

Lets outline the process:

- Someone interested in implementing feature X proposes on the dev list - lets say it has the following info: background on why (s)he thinks it is important (*what*/ *why*) as well as advertise a design page on the wiki and / or a functional spec that elaborates on the discussed feature idea (*how*) -
- This would generate discussion on a) how sound the arguments for feature introductions are etc. (i.e. discuss on *what* / *why*) b) how sound the design is or provide alternate suggestions/enhancements etc.
- upon consensus of the validity of both the *what/why* as well as *how*, developer goes ahead with the implementation and presents for code review
- upon approval of code (perhaps after a few iterations), a committer checks the code in

Does that sound like a decent outline?

If so, in this example case (multiple IPs), we are more or less at the *what/why* stage - although I realize the discussion needs to happen on the dev list - so, using this as an example case, what must a developer do now? Does (s)he still go ahead and make design specs as it is not clear if we have a consensus one way or the other on the *what/why* stage...

Regards,

Hari Kannan

-----Original Message-----
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:02 AM
To: <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance

Great questions!

So first, actual development decisions need to happen on the cloudstack-dev list, not users (although we love seeing user discussions about feature requests!).

The way it works on the dev list, is if you (or anyone) wants to propose building a feature, you would email the specifics of what you want to add. Generally, changes are agreed to by gathering consensus on both *what* and *how*. The developer that is building the feature would then (hopefully) do a design page on the wiki and / or a functional spec that elaborates on the discussed feature idea.
Getting consensus on that deign / functional spec then means moving forward to implementation.

The dev list is also the place to get help with figuring out how to add the feature (both logistically and technically).

Does that help?

-chip

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Hari Kannan <hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> As a newbie to Apache, I have a dumb procedural question -
>
> I see there are folks who are in favor of implementing this as well as folks who either believe there are workarounds and/or believe there is no NEED for this. However, if someone really wants to implement this, can/must anyone object? I can imagine if the implementation is bad, we can reject it, but are there any other reasons to NOT implement a feature?
>
> PS1: While this feature is an example, I want to under the general
> process/guideline for future reference
>
> Hari Kannan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:18 PM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I agree with Tamas. Cloudstack has functionality that would allow implementations using NAT/LoadBalancer configurations that would not require multiple IPs. Plus the NetScaler Service, if it is a true Netscaler implementation, supports loading the certs into it thus removing the multiple IP address requirement.
>
> -- James
> ________________________________________
> From: Tamas Monos [tamasm-MxBu3ZLyRkL10XsdtD+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:20 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Hi,
>
> Also I have tested earlier 3.0.2 and if you create multiple networks for the same account then the VM automatically gets that many IPs and NICs as many network the VM has.
> Then you can use static nat if you need to support multiple websites.
>
> Or another solution to this is to have many static nat IPs on the same network and port forward each IPs port 80 and 443 onto a different port on the VM and configure apache to listen on different ports for different virtual hosts.
> There is always a workaround.
>
> Regards
>
> Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012
> Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000
> Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 7057
> http://www.veber.co.uk
>
> Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook:
> www.facebook.com/veberhost
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:Kevin.Kluge-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 26 November 2012 19:03
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
>>
>> I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional interfaces.
>> I'd almost argue for requiring number of interfaces/IPs to be set at
>> machine instantiation and still handing out addresses to all
>> interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle that cleanly.
>
> As you probably know CS hands out IPs via DHCP to multiple NICs today, and it is challenging to work reliably since different guest OS's have different behavior with respect to setting/re-setting the default route in DHCP replies. Today CloudStack has some knowledge of guest OS to make this work but we've seen bugs with that where the list of guest OS behavior is not right. Those are fixable. But there are other cases (e.g. boot from ISO, a user changes the DHCP client post-create, or the user upgrades the OS which changes the DHCP client) where I don't think there is a reasonable fix. So I think we need at a minimum an option to disable DHCP reply on NICs that are not the default route. We should even consider a behavior change to make that the only option.
>
> -kevin
>
Chip Childers
2012-11-28 17:31:34 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Hari Kannan <hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Thanks, Chip - that helps!!! Another follow-up question, though..
>
> Lets outline the process:
>
> - Someone interested in implementing feature X proposes on the dev list - lets say it has the following info: background on why (s)he thinks it is important (*what*/ *why*) as well as advertise a design page on the wiki and / or a functional spec that elaborates on the discussed feature idea (*how*) -
> - This would generate discussion on a) how sound the arguments for feature introductions are etc. (i.e. discuss on *what* / *why*) b) how sound the design is or provide alternate suggestions/enhancements etc.
> - upon consensus of the validity of both the *what/why* as well as *how*, developer goes ahead with the implementation and presents for code review
> - upon approval of code (perhaps after a few iterations), a committer checks the code in
>
> Does that sound like a decent outline?

That's about right... of course variation is OK too. The main points
are (a) that we do our development in a collaborative and open way and
(b) that consensus gathering is critical to producing the best result.

> If so, in this example case (multiple IPs), we are more or less at the *what/why* stage - although I realize the discussion needs to happen on the dev list - so, using this as an example case, what must a developer do now? Does (s)he still go ahead and make design specs as it is not clear if we have a consensus one way or the other on the *what/why* stage...

At this point, I would suggest summarizing a few of the feature
options that may solve the use case. For example, there are
discussions about "reserving IP's for manual assignment within
instances", "figure out if DHCP can do this correctly", "use existing
LB and Elastic IP capabilities to achieve a similar result", etc...

>
> Regards,
>
> Hari Kannan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:02 AM
> To: <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Great questions!
>
> So first, actual development decisions need to happen on the cloudstack-dev list, not users (although we love seeing user discussions about feature requests!).
>
> The way it works on the dev list, is if you (or anyone) wants to propose building a feature, you would email the specifics of what you want to add. Generally, changes are agreed to by gathering consensus on both *what* and *how*. The developer that is building the feature would then (hopefully) do a design page on the wiki and / or a functional spec that elaborates on the discussed feature idea.
> Getting consensus on that deign / functional spec then means moving forward to implementation.
>
> The dev list is also the place to get help with figuring out how to add the feature (both logistically and technically).
>
> Does that help?
>
> -chip
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Hari Kannan <hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> As a newbie to Apache, I have a dumb procedural question -
>>
>> I see there are folks who are in favor of implementing this as well as folks who either believe there are workarounds and/or believe there is no NEED for this. However, if someone really wants to implement this, can/must anyone object? I can imagine if the implementation is bad, we can reject it, but are there any other reasons to NOT implement a feature?
>>
>> PS1: While this feature is an example, I want to under the general
>> process/guideline for future reference
>>
>> Hari Kannan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:18 PM
>> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
>> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>>
>> I agree with Tamas. Cloudstack has functionality that would allow implementations using NAT/LoadBalancer configurations that would not require multiple IPs. Plus the NetScaler Service, if it is a true Netscaler implementation, supports loading the certs into it thus removing the multiple IP address requirement.
>>
>> -- James
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Tamas Monos [tamasm-MxBu3ZLyRkL10XsdtD+***@public.gmane.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:20 AM
>> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
>> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Also I have tested earlier 3.0.2 and if you create multiple networks for the same account then the VM automatically gets that many IPs and NICs as many network the VM has.
>> Then you can use static nat if you need to support multiple websites.
>>
>> Or another solution to this is to have many static nat IPs on the same network and port forward each IPs port 80 and 443 onto a different port on the VM and configure apache to listen on different ports for different virtual hosts.
>> There is always a workaround.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012
>> Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000
>> Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 7057
>> http://www.veber.co.uk
>>
>> Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook:
>> www.facebook.com/veberhost
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:Kevin.Kluge-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
>> Sent: 26 November 2012 19:03
>> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
>> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>>
>>>
>>> I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional interfaces.
>>> I'd almost argue for requiring number of interfaces/IPs to be set at
>>> machine instantiation and still handing out addresses to all
>>> interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle that cleanly.
>>
>> As you probably know CS hands out IPs via DHCP to multiple NICs today, and it is challenging to work reliably since different guest OS's have different behavior with respect to setting/re-setting the default route in DHCP replies. Today CloudStack has some knowledge of guest OS to make this work but we've seen bugs with that where the list of guest OS behavior is not right. Those are fixable. But there are other cases (e.g. boot from ISO, a user changes the DHCP client post-create, or the user upgrades the OS which changes the DHCP client) where I don't think there is a reasonable fix. So I think we need at a minimum an option to disable DHCP reply on NICs that are not the default route. We should even consider a behavior change to make that the only option.
>>
>> -kevin
>>
>
Mathias Mullins
2012-11-28 19:12:04 UTC
Permalink
Why would we not log the request with a feature request bug in the apache jira? Since the option is there, would it be better to be able to allow developers to pull from that documented piece?

I'm new to Apache too so just wondering.

On Nov 28, 2012, at 12:39 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Hari Kannan <hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Thanks, Chip - that helps!!! Another follow-up question, though..
>>
>> Lets outline the process:
>>
>> - Someone interested in implementing feature X proposes on the dev list - lets say it has the following info: background on why (s)he thinks it is important (*what*/ *why*) as well as advertise a design page on the wiki and / or a functional spec that elaborates on the discussed feature idea (*how*) -
>> - This would generate discussion on a) how sound the arguments for feature introductions are etc. (i.e. discuss on *what* / *why*) b) how sound the design is or provide alternate suggestions/enhancements etc.
>> - upon consensus of the validity of both the *what/why* as well as *how*, developer goes ahead with the implementation and presents for code review
>> - upon approval of code (perhaps after a few iterations), a committer checks the code in
>>
>> Does that sound like a decent outline?
>
> That's about right... of course variation is OK too. The main points
> are (a) that we do our development in a collaborative and open way and
> (b) that consensus gathering is critical to producing the best result.
>
>> If so, in this example case (multiple IPs), we are more or less at the *what/why* stage - although I realize the discussion needs to happen on the dev list - so, using this as an example case, what must a developer do now? Does (s)he still go ahead and make design specs as it is not clear if we have a consensus one way or the other on the *what/why* stage...
>
> At this point, I would suggest summarizing a few of the feature
> options that may solve the use case. For example, there are
> discussions about "reserving IP's for manual assignment within
> instances", "figure out if DHCP can do this correctly", "use existing
> LB and Elastic IP capabilities to achieve a similar result", etc...
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hari Kannan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:02 AM
>> To: <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
>> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>>
>> Great questions!
>>
>> So first, actual development decisions need to happen on the cloudstack-dev list, not users (although we love seeing user discussions about feature requests!).
>>
>> The way it works on the dev list, is if you (or anyone) wants to propose building a feature, you would email the specifics of what you want to add. Generally, changes are agreed to by gathering consensus on both *what* and *how*. The developer that is building the feature would then (hopefully) do a design page on the wiki and / or a functional spec that elaborates on the discussed feature idea.
>> Getting consensus on that deign / functional spec then means moving forward to implementation.
>>
>> The dev list is also the place to get help with figuring out how to add the feature (both logistically and technically).
>>
>> Does that help?
>>
>> -chip
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Hari Kannan <hari.kannan-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> As a newbie to Apache, I have a dumb procedural question -
>>>
>>> I see there are folks who are in favor of implementing this as well as folks who either believe there are workarounds and/or believe there is no NEED for this. However, if someone really wants to implement this, can/must anyone object? I can imagine if the implementation is bad, we can reject it, but are there any other reasons to NOT implement a feature?
>>>
>>> PS1: While this feature is an example, I want to under the general
>>> process/guideline for future reference
>>>
>>> Hari Kannan
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:18 PM
>>> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
>>> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>>>
>>> I agree with Tamas. Cloudstack has functionality that would allow implementations using NAT/LoadBalancer configurations that would not require multiple IPs. Plus the NetScaler Service, if it is a true Netscaler implementation, supports loading the certs into it thus removing the multiple IP address requirement.
>>>
>>> -- James
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Tamas Monos [tamasm-MxBu3ZLyRkL10XsdtD+***@public.gmane.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:20 AM
>>> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
>>> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Also I have tested earlier 3.0.2 and if you create multiple networks for the same account then the VM automatically gets that many IPs and NICs as many network the VM has.
>>> Then you can use static nat if you need to support multiple websites.
>>>
>>> Or another solution to this is to have many static nat IPs on the same network and port forward each IPs port 80 and 443 onto a different port on the VM and configure apache to listen on different ports for different virtual hosts.
>>> There is always a workaround.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012
>>> Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000
>>> Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 7057
>>> http://www.veber.co.uk
>>>
>>> Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook:
>>> www.facebook.com/veberhost
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:Kevin.Kluge-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
>>> Sent: 26 November 2012 19:03
>>> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
>>> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional interfaces.
>>>> I'd almost argue for requiring number of interfaces/IPs to be set at
>>>> machine instantiation and still handing out addresses to all
>>>> interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle that cleanly.
>>>
>>> As you probably know CS hands out IPs via DHCP to multiple NICs today, and it is challenging to work reliably since different guest OS's have different behavior with respect to setting/re-setting the default route in DHCP replies. Today CloudStack has some knowledge of guest OS to make this work but we've seen bugs with that where the list of guest OS behavior is not right. Those are fixable. But there are other cases (e.g. boot from ISO, a user changes the DHCP client post-create, or the user upgrades the OS which changes the DHCP client) where I don't think there is a reasonable fix. So I think we need at a minimum an option to disable DHCP reply on NICs that are not the default route. We should even consider a behavior change to make that the only option.
>>>
>>> -kevin
>>
Kevin Kluge
2012-11-29 00:44:42 UTC
Permalink
CloudStack doesn't currently provision SSL offload with NetScaler. I think that'd be a great feature, although I assume you'd still have to resort to the multiple port approach (on the guest) even if CloudStack had SSL offload on to NetScaler.

-kevin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boylan, James [mailto:JAMES.BOYLAN-U2tS5KxEkOjQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:18 PM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I agree with Tamas. Cloudstack has functionality that would allow
> implementations using NAT/LoadBalancer configurations that would not require
> multiple IPs. Plus the NetScaler Service, if it is a true Netscaler implementation,
> supports loading the certs into it thus removing the multiple IP address
> requirement.
>
> -- James
> ________________________________________
> From: Tamas Monos [tamasm-MxBu3ZLyRkL10XsdtD+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:20 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Hi,
>
> Also I have tested earlier 3.0.2 and if you create multiple networks for the same
> account then the VM automatically gets that many IPs and NICs as many
> network the VM has.
> Then you can use static nat if you need to support multiple websites.
>
> Or another solution to this is to have many static nat IPs on the same network
> and port forward each IPs port 80 and 443 onto a different port on the VM and
> configure apache to listen on different ports for different virtual hosts.
> There is always a workaround.
>
> Regards
>
> Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012
> Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000
> Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 7057
> http://www.veber.co.uk
>
> Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook:
> www.facebook.com/veberhost
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:Kevin.Kluge-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 26 November 2012 19:03
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> >
> > I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional
> interfaces.
> > I'd almost argue for requiring number of interfaces/IPs to be set at
> > machine instantiation and still handing out addresses to all
> > interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle that cleanly.
>
> As you probably know CS hands out IPs via DHCP to multiple NICs today, and it is
> challenging to work reliably since different guest OS's have different behavior
> with respect to setting/re-setting the default route in DHCP replies. Today
> CloudStack has some knowledge of guest OS to make this work but we've seen
> bugs with that where the list of guest OS behavior is not right. Those are fixable.
> But there are other cases (e.g. boot from ISO, a user changes the DHCP client
> post-create, or the user upgrades the OS which changes the DHCP client) where I
> don't think there is a reasonable fix. So I think we need at a minimum an option
> to disable DHCP reply on NICs that are not the default route. We should even
> consider a behavior change to make that the only option.
>
> -kevin
Kevin Kluge
2012-11-29 00:42:10 UTC
Permalink
>
> Also I have tested earlier 3.0.2 and if you create multiple networks for the same
> account then the VM automatically gets that many IPs and NICs as many
> network the VM has.
> Then you can use static nat if you need to support multiple websites.

In this scenario where do you terminate the SSL? Could you support more than the max number of NICs per VM(typically 7 or so)?

>
> Or another solution to this is to have many static nat IPs on the same network
> and port forward each IPs port 80 and 443 onto a different port on the VM and
> configure apache to listen on different ports for different virtual hosts.
> There is always a workaround.

I agree this could be a workaround if the software supports SSL on non-standard ports. Some people use Plesk or Cpanel for the host management though and I didn't think these tools could handle this complexity. Anyway as you say it's a workaround -- we could do better with a cleaner solution.

-kevin

>
> Regards
>
> Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012
> Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000
> Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 7057
> http://www.veber.co.uk
>
> Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook:
> www.facebook.com/veberhost
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Kluge [mailto:Kevin.Kluge-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 26 November 2012 19:03
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> >
> > I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding additional
> interfaces.
> > I'd almost argue for requiring number of interfaces/IPs to be set at
> > machine instantiation and still handing out addresses to all
> > interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle that cleanly.
>
> As you probably know CS hands out IPs via DHCP to multiple NICs today, and it is
> challenging to work reliably since different guest OS's have different behavior
> with respect to setting/re-setting the default route in DHCP replies. Today
> CloudStack has some knowledge of guest OS to make this work but we've seen
> bugs with that where the list of guest OS behavior is not right. Those are fixable.
> But there are other cases (e.g. boot from ISO, a user changes the DHCP client
> post-create, or the user upgrades the OS which changes the DHCP client) where I
> don't think there is a reasonable fix. So I think we need at a minimum an option
> to disable DHCP reply on NICs that are not the default route. We should even
> consider a behavior change to make that the only option.
>
> -kevin
>
>
Clayton Weise
2012-11-21 19:44:46 UTC
Permalink
Agreed, and I believe this is possible with security groups, it would just require some kind of user intervention on the guest (either manually or via a tool like puppet, chef, cfengine, etc) to bind the second IP address to the NIC.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:29 AM
To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance

Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second IP will not work because of anti-spoofing.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest
> way
> and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release 4.1
> if it
> makes it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps
> necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to
> anything
> else and let the user manually add that second address? It just seems
> easier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-users
> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
>
> KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes
> ip's
> on the same nic.
>
> *Facundo Guerrero*
> *System Administrator*
> *IPaddress integradores de soluciones*
> Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117
> GPG ID: 0x14F4C737
> fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org
> *www.ipaddress.com.ar*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.childers-X+QBe+***@public.gmane.org>
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can
> > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC.
> > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC.
> >
> > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create
> > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple
> > IPs per NIC.
> >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per
> VM
> > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if
> > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL
> > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but
> > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be
> > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF.
> > >>
> > >> Matthew Hartmann
> > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E:
> > >> mhartmann-***@public.gmane.org
> > >>
> > >> TLS.NET, Inc.
> > >> http://www.tls.net
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> [mailto:Jonathan.Bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM
> > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >>
> > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jonathan Bastin
> > >> 07739668262
> > >>
> > >> ----- Reply message -----
> > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <Xuefei.Xu-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> To: "cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org"
> > >> <cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Subject: Multiple IP&apos;s to one instance
> > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'
> > >>
> > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more
> > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC?
> > >>
> > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Anthony
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM
> > >> > To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> >
> > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'.
> > >> Hope
> > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Jayapal
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
> > >> > > <geoff.higginbottom-***@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >This gets my vote
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Regards
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Geoff
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can
> > >> > > >get
> > >> this
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >happen.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25
> > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users
> > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i
> only
> > >> made
> > >> > nat
> > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into
> > >> > > >the
> > >> vm
> > >> > as
> > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Jira link >
> > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cweise-YlGd0BwvzKSsTnJN9+***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we
> can
> > >> vote
> > >> > on it.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerrero-8YP00/ycMuDiLp/***@public.gmane.org]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM
> > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Jonathan
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking
> > >> > > >> for
> > >> > this.
> > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that
> > >> > > >> open IP
> > >> > on
> > >> > > >> the same
> > >> > > >VM.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin
> > >> > <jonathan.bastin-SQYy84oN/8u3s3wHOSwLY9FnWgzzV5/***@public.gmane.org>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation
> > >> advanced
> > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. What
> > >> > > >> > I
> > >> want
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >> > know
> > >> > > >> is
> > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without
> > >> > > >> > using
> > >> an
> > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to
> assign
> > >> > > >> > say
> > >> 5
> > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > >> > > >> ----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >> -
> > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only
> > >> > > >> > for
> > >> the
> > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or
> > >> > privileged
> > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise
> > >> > > >> > used
> > >> by
> > >> > any
> > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please
> > >> contact
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The
> author's
> > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own
> > >> > > >> > and
> > >> not
> > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> > > >> > Internet
> > >> > Ltd
> > >> > > >> > or associated
> > >> > > >companies.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >-------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > >> > > >----
> > >> --
> > >> > ---
> > >> > > >---
> > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email
> > >> > (including
> > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above.
> > >> > It
> > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> > >> > > >not
> > >> be
> > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you
> are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> email
> > >> from
> > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> > >> thoughts
> > >> > are
> > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the
> > >> > > >Peer
> > >> > Point
> > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical
> > >> > > >consulting
> > >> and
> > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and
> > >> Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise,
> > >> > > >combined
> > >> > with
> > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and
> > >> > > >Enterprises
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >________________________________
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and
> > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
> > >> > > >is
> > >> > addressed.
> > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author
> > >> > > >and
> > >> > do
> > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are
> > >> > > >not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
> > >> > > >Please
> > >> > contact
> > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in
> error.
> > >> > Shape
> > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > >> ----
> > >> -----
> > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email
> > >> (including any
> > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It
> > >> may contain confidential or privileged information and should not
> > >> be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are
> > >> not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the
> > >> email from your system.
> > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their
> > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point
> > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------- This email
> (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are
> not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email
> from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and
> thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of
> the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...